英国大学卓越教学评估:为何评、评什么、如何看

The teaching excellence framework in UK:its context,results and responses

2017年6月,英国颁布了政府层面的大学卓越教学评估(TEF)结果,将参评高校的教学质量从高到低分为金、银、铜牌三个层次,并计划将评估结果与高校的学费调整挂钩。此举在英国高等教育界引发了极大反响和争议。文章回顾了英国大学卓越教学评估的背景、评估内容和方法,分析了评估的主要结果,特别关注了评估结果公布后在英国高等教育界产生的影响、反响和未来这一评估政策的走向。结合英国高校教学评估的经验,文章对我国正在实施的第二轮本科教学评估进行了反思,并从评估服务对象的聚焦、常态化统计数据的支撑、评估信息的全面公开、评估结果的多元化使用等方面提出了政策建议。

The first results of the government-level Teaching Excellence Framework（FEF）for assessment of the quality of undergraduate teaching in the UK universities and other higher education providers were promulgated in June 2017.The TEF rates universities as Gold,Silver or Bronze,in order of quality of teaching,and is to be linked with tuition fees in the near future.The move has caused great repercussions and controversies in the British higher education community.This paper reviews the background of the British university distinguished teaching evaluation,evaluation content and methods,analyzes the main results of the assessment,especially focuses on the impact,response and future trend of the evaluation policy after the publication of the evaluation results in the UK.Combined with the experience of college teaching evaluation This paper reviews the second-round undergraduate teaching evaluation in China.It also puts forward the policy suggestions from the aspects of the focus of the evaluation service object,the support of the normalized statistical data,the comprehensive disclosure of the assessment information and the diversification of the evaluation results.