期刊文献+

监管沙盒:兼容金融科技与金融监管的长效机制 被引量:32

Regulatory Sandbox:Financial Technology is Compatible with Financial Regulation in the Long-Term Mechanism
下载PDF
导出
摘要 金融科技驱动金融创新,当金融创新与现有的一般规则相抵触时,如果从严监管,则真正有价值的金融创新也会面临被阻遏的风险;反之,却会造成无法控制潜在风险的后果。首创于英国的监管沙盒机制将金融科技与金融创新置于安全空间,使之不会就其活动立刻产生违反一般法规的后果。即提供稳定与可预测的监管环境,使金融科技与金融创新在不受现有一般规则阻碍的同时,得到了实践经验作为其逐步完善的支撑,进而兼容金融监管与金融科技的发展,形成系统长效的监管机制。 Financial technology promote the development of financial innovation. When financial innovation contradicts the existing laws,the financial innovation of great significance may be blocked under the governmental control. On the contrary,weakening the regulation may also encounter the potential risks. Regulatory sandbox was firstly established in UK,it is a ‘safe space' in which it can test financial technology and financial innovation without immediately incurring the normal regulatory consequences of engaging in the activity in question. Under the stable and predictable regulatory environment,financial technology and financial innovation without impediment for existing laws,more importantly,it gains practical experience to support the further improvement. The regulatory sandbox can continue to maintain a regulatory mechanism that is effective and systematic enough to include the safe coexistence of financial regulation and financial technology.
作者 蔡元庆 黄海燕 Cai Yuan-qing;Huang Hai-yan
机构地区 深圳大学法学院
出处 《科技与法律》 2017年第1期1-12,共12页 Science Technology and Law
关键词 监管沙盒 金融科技 金融新创企业 金融监管 豁免 法律保障 Regulatory sandbox Financial technology Fintech start-ups Financial regulation Waivers Legal safeguards
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献175

  • 1李林.全球化背景下的中国立法发展[J].学习与探索,1998(1):93-100. 被引量:24
  • 2彭冰.构建针对特定对象的公开发行制度[J].法学,2006(5):81-89. 被引量:27
  • 3王泽鉴.债法原理[M].中国政法大学出版社,2001.126.
  • 4.2005年6月,北京市法学会召开"和谐社会法制论坛",本文是作者向论坛提交的论文《迈向和谐社会的法律路线图》的一部分[Z].,..
  • 5(德)伊梅尔曼 马祖礼译.《行为学导论》[M].南开大学出版社,.第160页.
  • 6刘国光.《进一步重视社会公平问题》[N].《经济参考报》,2005年4月21日.
  • 7郭锋.金融发展中的证券法律问题研究[M].法律出版社,2010:237.
  • 8James D. Cox Thomas L. Hazen , Business Organizations Law, WEST , P44.
  • 9Robert Charles Clark, Corporation Law, Little, Brown and Company: 761-762.
  • 10Guttentag, Michael D, Patching a Hole in the JOBS Act: How and Why to P.ewrite the Rules that P.equire Fimls to Make Periodic Disclosures[J]. Indiana Law Journal, Vol. 88, No. 1, 2013.

同被引文献233

引证文献32

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部