期刊文献+

群决策环境下一种三类偏好关系的集结方法

A method for aggregating three types of preference relations in group decision making environment
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在群决策环境下,专家们往往给出异类的偏好信息,如,模糊偏好关系、区间互补偏好关系、语言偏好关系.提出了一种新的集结这三类不同的偏好关系的方法,其基本思想是:先将不同类型信息转化为中间域(效用空间),然后进行集结.该方法的意义在于避免了不同类型偏好信息之间的直接相互转换,而且计算过程更加简便.首先,针对模糊偏好关系、区间互补偏好关系、语言偏好关系,利用效用的思想将这些偏好信息均转化为模糊偏好关系,并且讨论了转化过程的合理性.然后给出群决策过程中集结信息与选择最优方案的方法,最后通过实例验证了所提方法的实用性. Experts often give heterogeneous types of preference information,such as fuzzy preference relations,interval reciprocal preference relations and linguistic preference relations,in a group decision making environment.A new method was developed for aggregating these three types of preference relations,whose basic idea is that different kinds of information are transformed into an intermediate field(an utility space)before they are aggregated.The advantage of this method is that the direct interconversion among those different kinds of preference information is avoided and the computation process is more simple.Firstly,considering fuzzy preference relations,interval reciprocal preference relations and linguistic preference relations,these preference relations were transformed into fuzzy preference relations based on the idea of utility,and the reasonability in the transforming process was discussed.Then an approach was provided to aggregate those kinds of information and select the best alternatives in the group decision making process.Finally,the practicability of this method was illustrated with an example.
作者 涂振坤 段传庆 TU Zhenkun;DUAN Chuanqing(School of Mathematics, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, Chin)
出处 《中国科学技术大学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2018年第2期133-139,共7页 JUSTC
基金 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(JZ2016HGBZ0809)资助
关键词 群决策 不同类型偏好信息 转化方法 集结过程 group decision making heterogeneous types of preference information transforming method aggregating process
分类号 O934 [理学]
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献14

  • 1徐泽水.语言多属性决策的目标规划模型[J].管理科学学报,2006,9(2):9-17. 被引量:40
  • 2姜艳萍,樊治平.基于不同粒度语言判断矩阵的群决策方法[J].系统工程学报,2006,21(3):249-253. 被引量:46
  • 3陈侠,樊治平.基于不同偏好信息的评价专家水平研究[J].系统工程理论与实践,2007,27(2):27-35. 被引量:16
  • 4陈岩,樊治平,陈侠.一种基于不同粒度语言判断矩阵的群决策方法[J].东北大学学报(自然科学版),2007,28(7):1057-1060. 被引量:15
  • 5Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E, Verdegay J L. A model of consensus in group decision making under linguistic assessments[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1996,78 ( 1 ) : 73-87.
  • 6Chen C T. Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision- making under fury environment [ J ]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2000,114 ( 1 ) : 1 - 9.
  • 7Chen C T. A fuzzy approach to select the location of the distribution center[ J ]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2001,118(1):65-73.
  • 8Herrera F, Herrera Viedma E, Martinez L. A fusion approach for managing multi-granularity linguistic term sets in decision making[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2000,114 (1):43-58.
  • 9Jiang Y P, Fan Z P, Ma J. A method for group decision making with multi-granularity linguistic assessment information[ J ]. Information Sciences, 2008,178 (4) : 1098 - 1109.
  • 10Xu Z S. Uncertain linguistic aggregation operators based approach to multiple attribute group decision making under uncertain linguistic environment [ J ]. Information Sciences, 2004,168(1/2/3/4) : 171 - 184.

共引文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部