期刊文献+

货币政策、融资约束与企业投资 被引量:25

Monetary Policy, Financing Constraint and Enterprise Investment
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文在详细分析货币政策对融资约束影响的传导机制以及融资约束对企业投资的影响机制基础上,采用改进的FHP方法构建了融资约束指数,并利用中国沪深A股2007—2016年数据实证分析了三者之间的动态关系,结果发现:紧缩型货币政策使得企业的投资依赖内部现金流的程度增加;融资约束程度越高,越不利于企业投资和企业价值的积累;高融资约束对企业投资的负向冲击比低融资约束对企业投资的正向冲击更大,高融资约束对企业价值的负向冲击和低融资约束对企业价值的正向冲击几乎一致,没有表现出显著差异。 This paper utilizes improved FHP method to build the financing constraints index and uses the data of the Shanghai and Shenzhen A-shares from 2007 to 2016 to make empirical analysis of dynamic relationship among these three factors, namely monetary policy, financing constraints and enterprise investment, before analyzing the influence mechanism of monetary policy on financing constraints and the influence mechanism of financing constraint on enternterprise investment in detail. There are three findings. Firstly, a tight monetary policy would allow businesses to rely more on internal cash flows. Secondly, the higher the degree of financing restraint is, the more unfavorable the enternterprise investment and enterprise value accumulate. Thirdly, the negative impact of high financing constraint on enterenterprise investment is more, compared with positive impact on enterprise investment with low financing constraint, while the negative impact of high financing constraint on enterprise value and the positive impact of low financing constraint on enterprise value are almost identical, and there is no significant difference.
作者 杜传文 黄节根 Du Chuanwen1;Huang Jiegen2
出处 《财经科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第4期15-28,共14页 Finance & Economics
关键词 货币政策 融资约束 企业投资 FHP Monetary Policy Financing Constraint Enterprise Investment FHP
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献47

  • 1李琦,罗炜,谷仕平.企业信用评级与盈余管理[J].经济研究,2011,46(S2):88-99. 被引量:76
  • 2谢家智,刘思亚,李后建.政治关联、融资约束与企业研发投入[J].财经研究,2014,40(8):81-93. 被引量:130
  • 3Bond, S., and C. Meghir. 1994. Dynamic Investment Models and the Finn's Financial Policy. Review of Economics Studies, 61 (2): 197-222.
  • 4Chae, J. , and S. Kim. 2009. How Corporate Governance Affects Payout Policy under Agency Problems and External Fi- nancing Constraints. Journal of Banking and Finance, 33 (11) : 2093 -2101.
  • 5Hall, B. H. 2002. The Financing of Research and Devel- opment. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 18 ( 1 ) : 35 -51.
  • 6Himmelberg, C. P., and B. C. Petersen. 1994. R&D and Internal Finance: A Panel Study of Small Finns in High - tech Industries. Review of Economics and Statistics, 76 ( 1 ) : 38 -51.
  • 7Kumbhakar, S. C., and C. F. Parrneter. 2009. The Effects of Match Uncertainty and Bargaining on Labor market Outcomes: Evidence from Firm and Worker Specific Estimates. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 31 ( 1 ) : 1 - 14.
  • 8La Porta, R., F. Lopez -de - Silanesb, A. Shleifera, and R. W. Vishny. 2000. Investor Protection and Corporate Govern- ance. Journal of Financial Economies, 58 ( 1 - 2) : 3 - 27.
  • 9Richardson, S. 2006. Over - investment of Free Cash Flow. Review of Accounting Studies, 11 (2) : 159 - 189.
  • 10Tongue, N. , and R. Allan. 2013. Growth, R&D Intensi- ty and Commercial Lender Relationships. Journal of SmaU Busi- ness & Entrepreneurship, 26 (2) : 109 - 124.

同被引文献370

引证文献25

二级引证文献94

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部