摘要
基于ESI学科分类体系,以2004—2013年的SCI论文为数据样本,通过科学计量学的研究方法,从国际合作发展态势,主导地位变迁和主导论文影响力变迁4个角度分析中国各学科在科研国际合作中地位的变化,并与日本、印度的变化情况进行对比。结果表明,中国广泛开展国际合作,但国际合作率的排名与国际合作论文数的排名基本相反,多数学科国际合作率不稳定,合作范围越来越广;中国基础学科的主导率较高,但近几年呈下降趋势,医学相关学科增长较快,但仍相对较低;中国已有11个学科的主导论文影响力高于世界论文平均影响力,但各学科主导论文影响力均低于非主导论文。
Based on the ESI subject classification, taking the SCI paper published between 2004 and 2013 as the data set, this paper analyzed all subjects' leading position change of China in international collaboration by sciento- metrics, and compared with Japan's and India's. Specifically that: the China conducts extensive international col- laboration, but the international collaboration paper number's ranks and international collaboration rate's ranks go against, most of subjects' international collaboration rates are not stable, collaboration scope becomes more and more wide. Basic subjects were more tend to lead, but they showed a downward trend in recent years, a rapid growth of medical science, but still relatively low. China's leading papers in 11 disciplines have a higher in- fluence than the average influence of the world papers, but the influence of leading papers in various subjects were lower than the coordinate.
作者
岳晓旭
袁军鹏
黄萃
孙轶楠
YUE Xiaoxu;YUAN Jtmpeng;HUANG Cui;SUN Yi'nan(School of Public Policy and Management, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China;National Science Library, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China;School of Economics and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;Institute of Medical Information, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100005, China)
出处
《科学学与科学技术管理》
CSSCI
CSCD
北大核心
2018年第4期3-17,共15页
Science of Science and Management of S.& T.
关键词
国际合作
主导地位
ESI学科分类
SCI
科学计量学
intemational collaboration
the leading position
ESI subject classification
SCI
scientometrics