期刊文献+

双额叶挫裂伤患者病情恶化的临床及影像学危险因素及手术干预效果分析 被引量:1

The clinical and iconography risk factors for progression after bifrontal contusions and the efficacy of operation intervention
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨双额叶挫裂伤后病情恶化的临床与影像学相关危险因素以及手术干预的效果。方法选择2014年4月-2017年4月于本院就诊的84例双额叶挫裂伤患者,分析病情恶化和病情稳定患者临床和影像学检查的差异,多因素Logistics回归分析引起病情恶化的相关独立危险因素。对病情恶化患者采取手术干预,并比较病情恶化组和病情稳定组患者的预后差异。结果病情恶化组的年龄、多处受伤比例、入院时ICP和D-二聚体水平较高,入院时GCS较低(P<0.05);病情恶化组的挫裂伤体积、中线移位距离和合并双侧血肿、颅骨骨折的比例显著高于病情稳定组(P<0.05)。多因素Logistics回归分析显示,入院时低GCS评分、高ICP,挫裂伤体积、中线移位和合并颅骨骨折是双额叶挫裂伤患者病情恶化的独立危险因素。病情恶化组术后与病情稳定组的1年病死率(8.70%vs.5.26%,P>0.05)和预后不良率(23.68%vs.28.26%,P>0.05)无明显差异。结论入院时低GCS评分、高ICP,挫裂伤体积、中线移位和合并颅骨骨折是双额叶挫裂伤患者病情恶化的独立危险因素;对高危患者进行手术干预,可以改善患者预后。 Objective To observe the clinical and iconography risk factors for progression after bifrontal contusions and the efficacy of operation intervention.Methods From April 2014 to April 2017,84 traumatic brain injury patients with bifrontal contusions were screened,while the clinical and iconography factors were comparatively analyzed.The multiple factor logistic regression analysis was used to observe the risk factors of for progression after bifrontal contusions.Results There were significant differences in age,multiple injury rate,D-dimer,Glasgow Coma scale(GCS)intracranial pressure(ICP)between the stable group and the progressive group.The percentage of contusion volume,midline shift distance,bilateral hematoncus and skull fracture in the progressive group was significantly higher than those in the stable group(P〈0.05).The multiple factor logistic regression analysis showed that the GCS and ICP on admission,contusion volume,midline shift,skull fracture were the independent risk factors for progression after bifrontal contusions.While there were no obvious differences in the 1-year mortality(8.70% vs.5.26%,P〉0.05)and poor prognosis rate(23.68% vs.28.26%,P〉0.05)between the stable group and the progressive group.Conclusion The GCS and ICP on admission,contusion volume,bilateral hematoncus,skull fracture were independent risk factors for progression after bifrontal contusions.Operation intervention could improve the prognosis in the early stage for patients with risk factors.
作者 陆明 闻峰 郭春华 Lu Ming;Wen Feng;Guo Chunhua(Department of Neurosurgery , Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital of Zhangjiagang City, Zhangjiagang Jiangsu 215600)
出处 《卒中与神经疾病》 2018年第1期39-42,共4页 Stroke and Nervous Diseases
关键词 颅脑损伤 额叶 挫裂伤 危险因素 手术干预 Traumatic brain injury Bifrontal Contusion Risk factors Operation intervention
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献37

  • 1何朝晖,支兴刚,唐文渊.“中型”颅脑损伤患者亚急性期突发脑疝临床分析[J].重庆医科大学学报,2005,30(5):763-765. 被引量:2
  • 2陈新军,袁先厚,江普查,楚胜华,李志强.CT观察脑挫裂伤时第三脑室及基底池形态改变的临床意义[J].中华神经医学杂志,2006,5(12):1235-1237. 被引量:12
  • 3耿晓增,孙华北.双额叶脑挫裂伤54例临床分析[J].急诊医学,1997,6(2):92-93. 被引量:31
  • 4Toutant SM, Klauber MR, Marshall LF, et al. Absent or compressed basal cisterns on first CT scan: Ominous predictors of outcomeins evere head injury[J]. J Neurosurg, 1984, 61(4): 691-694.
  • 5Eisenberg HM, Gary HE Jr, Aldrich EF, et al. Initial CT findings in 753 patients with severe head injury: A report from the NIH traumatic coma data bank[J]. J Neurosurg, 1990, 73(5): 688-698.
  • 6Imbillo S, Bolanos J, Carreira L, et al. Prognostic value of early computerized tomography scanning following craniotomy for traumatic hematoma[J]. J Neurosurg, 1999, 91(4): 581-587.
  • 7Alahmadi H, Vachhrajani S, Cusimano MD. The natural history of brain contusion: an analysis of radiological and clinical progression - clinical article. J Nenrosurg, 2010, 112: 1139- 1145.
  • 8Kawamata T, Mori T, Sato S, et al. Tissue hyperosInolality and brain edema in cerebral contusion. Neurosurg Focus, 2007, 22 : ES.
  • 9Bratton SL, Chestnut RM, Ghajar J, et al. Guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brain injury. Viii Intracranialpressure thresholds. J Neurotrauma, 2007, 24:$55-58.
  • 10Bullock MR, Chesnut R, Ghajar J, et al. Surgical management of traumatic parenchymal lesions. Neurosurgery, 2006, 58 :$2546.

共引文献84

同被引文献13

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部