期刊文献+

论国际投资法中的公平公正待遇标准的内涵——基于条约和国际仲裁实践的互动研究

On the connotation of the standard for fair and equitable treatment in International Investment Law——An interactive study based on treaty and practice of international arbitration
下载PDF
导出
摘要 关于公平公正待遇条款,无论从文本上存在于国际投资协定的普遍性,还是从实践中被应用于国际投资争端仲裁的广泛性来看,无疑都是国际投资法领域的"帝王条款"。但相较于国内民法上的诚实信用原则,由于其在国际投资协定中的定位不明、内涵模糊等原因,造成实践中投资者的滥用和仲裁庭对其内涵的扩张性解读。纠正当前实践中的偏轨现象,首先要做的是肯定公平公正待遇条款是法律原则而非法律规则。国际投资仲裁实践必须正确定位公平公正待遇条款,在适用时严格把握法律原则应用于司法裁判的前置条件。 The fair and equitable treatment clause is undoubtedly the "Imperial Clause" in the field of interna- tional investment law, whether from the universality of the international investment agreement in the text or from the broadness of being applied in the arbitration for international investment dispute in practice. However, com- pared with the principle of good faith in domestic civil law, due to its unclear positioning, vague meaning and oth- er reasons in the international investment agreement, cause the abuse of investors in practice and the arbitral tribu- nal' s expansionary interpretation of its connotation. To correct the deviant phenomenon in current practice, the first thing to do is to affirm that the fair and equitable treatment clause is a legal principle rather than a legal rule. The international investment arbitration practice must correctly position the fair and equitable treatment clause and, when applicable, strictly apply the legal principle to the preconditions of judicial system.
作者 葛涛 Ge Tao(East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 200042, Chin)
机构地区 华东政法大学
出处 《辽宁公安司法管理干部学院学报》 2018年第2期93-97,共5页 Journal of Liaoning Administrators College of Police and Justice
关键词 国际投资 公平公正待遇标准 国际投资争端仲裁 international investment standards for fair and equitable treatment arbitration for international in-vestment dispute
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献108

  • 1徐国栋.诚实信用原则二题[J].法学研究,2002,24(4):74-88. 被引量:115
  • 2余劲松.外资的公平与公正待遇问题研究——由NAFTA的实践产生的几点思考[J].法商研究,2005,22(6):41-48. 被引量:39
  • 3S. Hindelang. Bilateral Investment Treaties, Custom and a Healthy Investment Climate--The Question of Whether BITs Influence Customary International Law Revisited [ J ]. The Journal of World Investment & Trade, Vol. 5, 2004.
  • 4M. C. Porterfield. San International Common Law of Investor Rights? [J]. University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Economic Law, Vol. 27, 2006.
  • 5H. M. Franck. The Power of Legitimacy among Nations [ M]. Oxford University Press, 1990.
  • 6C. Schreuer. Decisions Ex Aequo et Bono under the ICSID Convention [ J ]. ICSID Review--Foreign Investment Law Journal, Vol. 11, 1996.
  • 7V. Lowe. Changing Dimensions of International Investment Law, Lecture 4--Fair and Equitable Treatment [ Z ] , Summer Programme of Xiamen Academy of International Law, 2006.
  • 8T. J. Westcott. Recent Practice on Fair and Equitable Treatment [ J]. The Journal of World Investment & Trade, Vol. 8, 2007.
  • 9P. Kelly. The Twilight of Customary International Law [ J ]. Virginia Journal of International Law, Vol. 40, 2000.
  • 10C. Schreuer. Fair and Equitable Treatment in Arbitral Practice [ J ]. The Journal of World Investment & Trade, Vol. 6, 2005.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部