《九辩》乃“宋玉代屈原设言之作”辨——从《楚辞》成书之体例出发兼论“整体观照”之重要

The Analysis of the View That Song Yu's Jiu Bian Was Written from the Standing of Qu Yuan:on the Importance of Holism from the Style of Chu Ci

关于《九辩》之作者,前贤时彦多有考辨且说法不一。或从东汉王逸说,主宋玉作;或从明代焦竑说,主屈原作;或否定以上二说,认为作者乃汉代人。以上诸说,以王、焦二说最为常见,又王逸说乃学界主流看法,焦竑说则因证据不足而难以立论。然鉴于焦说不仅曾产生过不小影响,且进入本世纪后尚时有从之者,故此论题仍有继续研讨之必要。就《楚辞》成书之体例出发进行整体观照,足证王逸之说无疑。《九辩》只能是宋玉之,且只能是代屈原设言之作,否则,无以解释其何以入选《楚辞》。

Previous scholars had investigated and discussed the author of Jiu Bian,Drawing different conclusions：Wang Yi in Eastern Han Dynasty held that Song Yu was the main author,Jiao Hong in Ming Dynasty insisted that Qu Yuan was the main author,or the author was neither but someone in Han Dynasty.The Views of Wang and Jiao are commonest in Academy,with Wang Yi＇s view gaining the mainstream support,Jiao Hong＇s lacking persuasion for the lack of evidence.However,considering the influence of Jiao＇s View,and the fact that there are still followers of his view in this century,the discussion of who＇s the author is necessary.Because of the holism from the Style of Chu Ci,Wang Yi＇s view is right：Jiu Bian was written by Song Yu from the standing of Qu Yuan,otherwise it wouldn＇t appear in Chu Ci.