期刊文献+

人车事故中不同体型行人应急姿态仿真研究 被引量:4

Simulation research on emergency postures of pedestrians different in body type in pedestrian-vehicle accident
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为降低行人在与运动型多功能车(SUV)碰撞事故中的损伤程度,从国家车辆事故深度调查体系(NAIS)中选取一例典型的事故案例,运用Madymo建立事故碰撞模型,并验证其有效性,在此基础上进行仿真试验,研究SUV车辆低速情况下,5%女性假人、50%和95%男性假人在前倾、下蹲、站立等3种应急姿态下的损伤情况。结果表明:前倾是很危险的应急姿态;下蹲和站立姿态对中等和高大身材行人是良好的自我保护措施;小身材行人在3种应急姿态下与SUV碰撞易受致命伤。 For the sake of reducing the damage to pedestrians in pedestrian-SUV collision accidents,a accident collision model was built by using Madymo,on the basis of the data on a typical accident case in the National Automobile Accident In-depth Investigation System( NAIS). The effectiveness of the model was proved. The damage to 5 percentile female dummies,and that to 50 and 95 percent male dummies in three emergency postures( forward,squat,standing) were studied by computer simulation testing. The results show that forward is a very dangerous posture,that taking a squat or a standing posture for middle and tall figure pedestrians is a good self-protection measures,and that small body pedestrians taking any of the three kinds of emergency postures usually receive a fatal injury.
作者 尹均 张道文 肖凌云 张鹏 夏茂栩 黄先婷 YIN Jun;ZHANG Daowen;XIAO Lingyun;ZHANG Peng;XIA Maoxu;HUANG Xianting(School of Transportation & Automotive, Xihua University, Chengdu Sichuan 610039, China;Sichuan Xihua Forensic Institute, Chengdu Sichuan 610039, China;China National Institute of Standardization, Beijing 100191, China)
出处 《中国安全科学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2018年第2期51-56,共6页 China Safety Science Journal
基金 成都市科技惠民项目(2015-HM01-00369-SF) 国家车辆事故深度调查体系NAIS(16203269) 西华大学研究生创新基金资助(ycjj2016091)
关键词 行人损伤 人车碰撞 应急姿态 运动型多功能车(SUV) MADYMO damage to pedestrian car-pedestrian collision emergency posture sports utility vehicle(SUV) Madymo
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献30

  • 1公安部交通管理局.中华人民共和国道路交通事故统计年报(2010年度)[R].无锡:公安部交通管理科学研究所,2011.
  • 2GA/T643--2006.典型交通事故形态车辆行驶速度技术鉴定[S].2006.
  • 3Eubanks J J, Hill P F. Pedestrian accident recontruction and litiga- tion. Lawyers & Judges Publishing Co, Inc. Second Edition. 1998.
  • 4Searle J A, Searle A. The trajectories of pedestrians, motorcycles, motorcyclists, etc. following a road accident. ASME Paper, 1983:831622.
  • 5Rau H, Otte D, Schulz B. Pkw-FuBga"ngerkollisionen im hohen Ge- schwindigkeitsbereich Ergebnisse von Dummyversuchen mit Kollision- sgeschwindigkeiten zwischen 70 and 90 km/h. Verkehrsunfall und Fahrzeugtechnik, 2000 ; (12) :341-350.
  • 6Toor A, Araszewski M. Theoretical vs. empirical solutions for vehi- cle/pedestrian collisions. ASME Paper,2003-( 01 ) -0883,2003.
  • 7Simms C K, Wood D P, Walsh D G. Confidence limits for impact speed estimation from pedestrian projection distance. International Journal of Crashworthiness, 2004 ;9 (2) :219-228.
  • 8Moser A, Hosehopf H, Steffan H, et al. Validation of the PC-Crash pedestrian model. ASME Paper, 2000-01-0847.
  • 9TNO Automotive. Theory manual-Madymo V7.5. 2013.
  • 10Van Rooi J L, Bhalla K, Meissner M. Pedestrian crash reconstruction using multi-body modeling with geometrically detailed, validated vehi- cle models and advanced pedestrian injury criteria. Proceeding of 18th International Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicle, 2003.

共引文献25

同被引文献33

引证文献4

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部