期刊文献+

Deleveraging: Definition, Priorities and Policy Options

Deleveraging: Definition, Priorities and Policy Options
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Dividing aggregate liabilities by GDP is not an appropriate method for calculating the leverage ratio, and may mislead deleveraging operations. In terms of an intrinsic mechanism, an appropriate measure of leverage ratio should be the liability/asset ratio. In their business operations, it is inevitable for real-economy enterprises to incur liabilities arising from business and financial transactions. Therefore, the significance of deleveraging operations is to reduce the leverage ratio below a certain threshold to effectively prevent risks arising from an excessive leverage ratio, rather than to reduce the liability ratio of real-economy enterprises to zero. For real-economy enterprises, a key question is how to adjust their debt structure by reducing current liabilities and increasing mid-and long-term liabilities. The debt structure of real-economy enterprises is primarily determined by their financial structure. Hence, it is essential to adjust the financial structure in order to improve the debt structure of real-economy enterprises and increase the share of direct finance. Various risks exist in the combination of shares and bonds within the banking system, investment-lending linkage and market-based debt-to-equity operations, which are options in reducing the leverage ratio for real-economy enterprises. From the standpoint of giving play to capital market functions, it is advisable to increase the issuance of midand long-term corporate bonds and preferred stock, restrict non-financial listed companies from engaging in financial operations and the shareholders of listed companies from selling shares, encourage equity investment institutions to enhance equity investment in realeconomy enterprises, and further develop the financing function of the stock market. Dividing aggregate liabilities by GDP is not an appropriate method for calculating the leverage ratio, and may mislead deleveraging operations. In terms of an intrinsic mechanism, an appropriate measure of leverage ratio should be the liability/asset ratio. In their business operations, it is inevitable for real-economy enterprises to incur liabilities arising from business and financial transactions. Therefore, the significance of deleveraging operations is to reduce the leverage ratio below a certain threshold to effectively prevent risks arising from an excessive leverage ratio, rather than to reduce the liability ratio of real-economy enterprises to zero. For real-economy enterprises, a key question is how to adjust their debt structure by reducing current liabilities and increasing mid-and long-term liabilities. The debt structure of real-economy enterprises is primarily determined by their financial structure. Hence, it is essential to adjust the financial structure in order to improve the debt structure of real-economy enterprises and increase the share of direct finance. Various risks exist in the combination of shares and bonds within the banking system, investment-lending linkage and market-based debt-to-equity operations, which are options in reducing the leverage ratio for real-economy enterprises. From the standpoint of giving play to capital market functions, it is advisable to increase the issuance of midand long-term corporate bonds and preferred stock, restrict non-financial listed companies from engaging in financial operations and the shareholders of listed companies from selling shares, encourage equity investment institutions to enhance equity investment in realeconomy enterprises, and further develop the financing function of the stock market.
作者 Wang Guogang 王国刚(School of Finance, Renmin University of China,China Financial Policy Research Center, Beijing, China)
出处 《China Economist》 2018年第2期18-26,共9页 中国经济学人(英文版)
关键词 leverage ratio definition priorities policy options 优先级 金融结构 金融交易 定义 投资机构 市场功能 银行系统 证券市场
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献20

  • 1马骏,张晓蓉,李治国,2012.《中国国家资产负债表研究》,社会科学文献出版社.
  • 2野村证券,2013,《中国正在升起的金融风险》,研究报告.
  • 3Allen,M. , C. Rosenberg, C. Keller, B. Setser & N. Roubini. 2002. "A Balance Sheet Approach to Financial Crisis" IMF working paper, December.
  • 4Black,F. , and M. Scholes. 1973. "The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liablitiles"Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 81.
  • 5Castren, O. , and L. M. Kavonius. 2009. "Balance Sheet Interlinkages and Macro - financial Risk Analysis in the Euro Area" European Central Bank Working Papers, No 1124, December.
  • 6Cecchetti .S, , M. Mohanty and F. Zampolli. 2011. "The Real Effects of Debt" BIS Working Papers, No 352, September.
  • 7Gray, D. , and A.Jobst. 2010. "New Directions in Financial Sector and Sovereign Risk Management"Journal of Investment Management, 2010, 8(1) :23 -38.
  • 8Gray ,D. , Cheng Hoon Lim, E. Loukoianova, and S. Malone. 2008. "A Risk - based Debt Sustanability Framework: Incorporating Balances Sheets and Uncertainty" IMF working paper, February.
  • 9Gray, D. , andJ. Walsh. 2008. "Factor Model for Stress - Testing with a Contingent Claims Model of the Chilean Banking System" IMF working paper, August.
  • 10Gray, D. , R. Merton, and Z. Bodie. 2007, "Contingent Claims Approach to Measuring and Managing Sovereign Credit Risk"Journal of Investment Management, 5 (4) :5 - 35.

共引文献163

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部