期刊文献+

腰椎翻修手术的临床研究 被引量:1

Clinical research of lumbar reoperation
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨行腰椎翻修手术患者的常见原因,手术方式选择,预防失败的措施。方法 2014年1月—2016年12月郑州大学第一附属医院行二次手术的患者共65例。对该组患者进行疗效评价,分析失败的原因及预防策略。结果手术时间1.5~6 h,平均(4.34±1.08)h。术中出血量50~2 650 ml,平均(886.17±1 507.16)ml。术前术后ODI评分和VAS评分有统计学意义(P<0.05)。翻修术后椎间隙高度,术后3~5 d与术后6个月无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后6个月CT示融合率100%。结论腰椎二次手术过程困难且复杂,术后效果良好。多种原因为导致腰椎手术失败,应从术前、术中及术后等多方面预防手术失败的发生。 Objective To study the main reasons,operation methods,and preventive actions of the lumbar reoperation.Methods From January 2014 to Decemeber 2016 totally 65 patients underwent the lumbar reoperaion. The effects were evaluated. The reasons and preventive actions were discussed. Results The reoperaion time was 1. 5-6 hours,(average 4. 34 ± 1. 08 hours). The bleeding volumn was 50-2 650 ml,average(886. 17 ± 357. 74) ml. There were significant statistical differences in ODI and VAS scores between the pre-operation and the post-operation(P〈0. 05). There was no significant statistical difference in the disc height between 3-5 days and 6 months after the reoperation. The fusion rate after 6 month was 100% illustrated by CT scan. Conclusion The reoperaion process is complicated and the result is satisfied. Various reasons can lead to the fail of lumbar operation. Many actions from pre-operaion to the post-operation can prevent the lumbar operation from failure.
作者 唐瑞 王玉强 刘屹林 王利民 TANG Rui;WANG Yu - qiang;LIU Yi - lin;WANG Li - min(The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450052, Chin)
出处 《医药论坛杂志》 2018年第2期38-40,共3页 Journal of Medical Forum
基金 河南省医学科技攻关计划项目(201503017)
关键词 腰椎 再手术 内固定器 Lumbar vertebrae Reoperation Internal fixation
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献21

  • 1戴守达,郝允河,栾修荣,林恩及,王克富.腰椎间盘突出症术式选择与疗效分析(附362例报告)[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,1994,4(4):165-167. 被引量:23
  • 2Boswell MV,Shah RV,Everett CR,et al. Interventional techniques in the management of chronic spinal pain:Evidencebased practice guidelines[M]. Pain Physician,2005. 8: 1-47.
  • 3Bressler HB,Keyes WJ,Rochon PA,Badtey E,et al. The prevalence of low back pain in the elderly. A systemic review of the literature[J]. Spine, 1999,24: 1813-1819.
  • 4Atlas SJ,Deyo RA,Keller RB,et al. The maine lumbar spine study,Part Ⅱ. 1-year outcomes of surgical and nonsurgical management of sciatica[J]. Spine, 1996,21 ( 15 ) : 1777-1786.
  • 5Atlas SJ,Keller RB,Chang Y,et al. Surgical and nonsurgical management of sciatica secondary to a lumbar disc herniation: five-year outcomes from the Maine Lumbar Spine Study[J].Spine,2001,26(10):1179-1187.
  • 6James N. Weinstein,DO MSc,Jon D,et al. Surgical vs nonoperative trealment for lumbar disk herniation the spine patient out- comes research trial (SPORT)observational cohort [J]. JAMA, 2006,296 : 2451-2459.
  • 7Dudek H,Michno T,Michalski J. Immediate and short-teml resuits of surgical treatment for lumbar disc protrusion in children and adolescents[J].Polish. Chir Narzadow Ruchu Ortop Pol, 1998,63(2): 109-115.
  • 8Keller RB,Atlas SJ,Soule DN,et al. Relationship between rates and outcomesof operative treatment for lumbar disc herniation and spinal stenosis[J]. J Bone Joint SurgCAm)1999,81:752-762.
  • 9Prolo DJ,Oklund SA,Butcher M. Toward uniformityin evaluating results of lumbar spine operations. A paradigm applied to posterior lumbar interbody fusions[J]. Spine, 1986,11:601-606.
  • 10Davis RA. A long-term outcome analysis of 984 surgically treated herniated lumbar discs [J]. J Neurosurg,1994,80:415- 421.

共引文献92

同被引文献9

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部