期刊文献+

外文学术电子图书评价研究——基于Bookmetrix的实证分析 被引量:10

Research on the Evaluation of Foreign Scholarly Electronic Books——Empirical Analysis Based on Bookmetrix
下载PDF
导出
摘要 外文学术图书,对于高校的教学、科研活动有较高的学术指导价值。对外文学术电子图书进行评价能够全面反映其影响力。本文综合运用Altmetrics和传统的引文评价,利用Bookmetrix工具,明确对不同学科(以化学、社会科学为例)的学术电子图书进行探索性研究,对文献计量指标(引文)与Altmetrics指标(Mendeley读者数和下载量)的相关性与一致性进行定量分析,并对引文量、读者数、下载量是否有显著性差异进行了非参数检验。研究发现:Citations、Mendeley Readers、Downloads具有较高的覆盖率,经Mann-Whitney非参数检验,化学和社会科学的外文学术电子图书的被引量、读者数没有显著差异,但是二者的下载量有显著差异。化学图书的被引量与Mendeley读者数的相关性明显高于社会科学图书的被引量与Mendeley读者数的相关性。 The academic books of foreign languages have higher academic value for the teaching and scientific research activities of universities. The evaluation of the foreign language scholarly electronic books can fully reflect its influence. This paper utilized Altmetrics and traditional citation evaluation model synthetically,with Bookmetrix,definitely to explore the performance of different disciplines of academic electronic books(taking Chemistry and Social sciences as examples),the correlation and consistency of bibliometric indicator(Citation) and Altmetric indicators(Mendeley Readers and Cownloads) were quantitatively analyzed,and nonparametric tests were carried out on the difference of citation,reader counts and download. It found that: citation,Mendeley readers,downloads with higher coverage rate,by Mann-whitney nonparametric test,chemistry and social sciences of foreign language scholarly electronic books were not significantly different from the number of readers,but the downloads of the two had significant differences. The correlation between the citation of and the number of Mendeley readers of chemistry books was significantly higher than that of the social science books.
作者 匡登辉 Kuang Denghui(Library, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China)
机构地区 南开大学图书馆
出处 《现代情报》 CSSCI 2018年第5期110-116,共7页 Journal of Modern Information
基金 2016年南开大学亚洲研究中心资助项目"高品质科技期刊的Altmetrics分析"(项目编号:AS 1606)
关键词 外文 学术电子图书 Bookmetrix 实证分析 foreign language academic e-book Bookmetrix empirical analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献48

  • 1王声培,云雅娟.洛特卡定律、普赖斯定律和我国数学科学文献[J].图书情报工作,1994,38(3):21-24. 被引量:39
  • 2魏屹东.国际刊物《Scientometrics》文献计量研究[J].科学技术与辩证法,1995,12(6):40-44. 被引量:28
  • 3徐恩元,徐建华.文献老化理论研究[J].四川图书馆学报,2006(6):63-67. 被引量:30
  • 4Shedlock J,Walton L J.Developing a virtual community for health sciences library book selection:Doody's Core Titles.J Med Libr Assoc,2006,94(1):61-66.
  • 5American Mathe-matical Society.Mathematics Subject Classification 2000.[2006-11-01].http://www.ams.org/mathweb/msc2000.
  • 6Priem J, Groth P, Taraborelli D. The Altmetrics Collection [J] .PLoS One, 2012, 7 (11): 35-39.
  • 7How is the Altmetric score calculated? [EB/OL] . [2014-08-15] . http://support.altmetric.com/knowledgebase/ articles/83337-how-is-the-altmetric-score-calculated.
  • 8http:∥www.webofknowledge.com/wos.
  • 9https:∥www.scopus.com/.
  • 10https:∥www.altmetric.com/.

共引文献65

同被引文献192

引证文献10

二级引证文献50

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部