期刊文献+

类属性思维(Stereotype)的三维度理论及其争议

The Three-Dimensional Theory of Stereotypes: Controversy and Advancement of Its Potency,Accuracy and Evaluation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 类属性思维(stereotype)是社会心理学研究的一个重要课题。然而,其概念和三维度——激活性、准确性、评价性在人类决策过程中的作用以及实质等方面均存在争议。与一般人们对类属性思维的理解不同,从激活性来看,类属性思维被激活的程度是不同的,并非总是被自动激活;从评价性来看,类属性思维消极与积极的程度有异,并不总是消极的;从准确性来说,大多数类属性思维的准确性是很高的,并不像人们所认为的"多与事实不符"。类属性思维对个人判断并不一定会产生特别大的负面影响,它也不是人际交往间产生偏见的主要原因。类属性思维,包括图腾思维和宗教思维,从实质上来看是人类进化和图腾认知的产物,它的本质是人类在不确定情况下对自然和社会现实进行分类的结果。 Social psychologists tend to agree that stereotypes are a very important research area.Though people associate stereotypes with prejudice and discrimination,this paper tries to clarify some incorrect ideas about stereotypes through the unique theory of EPA theoretical model(E=Evaluation,P=Potency and A=Accuracy).First,with regard to potency,stereotypes can range from automatic activation to little or no activation in a perceiver.In some situations,we can easily retrieve information from our experience or memories concerning the category of idea.But in other situations,we cannot easily do so.Second,with respect to evaluation,stereotypes are not necessarily negative,and stereotypes can be positive as much as negative.Third,in terms of accuracy,many stereotypes may be accurate largely while some are not.It is also pointed out that stereotypes may not affect human individuals'judgments.Nor can they cause people to have bias or discrimination.Finally,we explore the essence of stereotypes through evolutionary and totemic views.Totems link the natural world with the human world,and help us to categorize both animals and humans.Modern stereotypes serve the same categorizing function.In essence,stereotypes are the products of human evolution and totem cognition,which result from the categorizing of nature and social reality by human beings.
出处 《华南师范大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第2期5-16,191,共12页 Journal of South China Normal University:Social Science Edition
关键词 类属性思维 EPA理论模型 进化论 图腾 stereotypes EPA theoretical model evolution totems
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献217

  • 1佐斌,刘晅.基于IAT和SEB的内隐性别刻板印象研究[J].心理发展与教育,2006,22(4):57-63. 被引量:39
  • 2Hamilton D. L., Trolier T. K. Stereotypes and stereotyping: An overview of the cognitive approach. In: J. F. Dovidio, Gaertner(Eds.). Prejudice, discrimination and racism. New York: Academic Press, 1986:127-163.
  • 3Rosenberg S., Nelson C., Vivekananthan P. S. A multidimensional approach to the structure of personality impressions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1968,9:283-294.
  • 4Ashmore R. D., Del F. K. Boca. What research on physical attractiveness can teach us. In: Lee J. Jussim(Ed.). Accuracy of stereotypes: toward appreciating group differences. Washing, DC:American Psychological Association, 1995:64.
  • 5Hilton J. L, Hippel W. Stereotypes. Annual Review of Psychology,1996, 47:237-271.
  • 6Lee Y. T., Jussim L., McMcauley C. Accuracy of stereotypes:toward appreciating group differences. Washing, DC: The American Psychological Association, 1995:30-32.
  • 7Lippman W. Public Opinion. New York: Macmillan, 1922, In..Jeffrey L., Eward G. C., Paul M. S. The empirical dimensionality of racial stereotype. Public opinion quarterly. Chicago, 1999,63:371-385.
  • 8Triandis H. C. , Vassiliou V. Frequency of contact and stereotyping.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1967,7:316-328.
  • 9Funder D. C. Errors and mistakes: Evaluating the accuracy of social judgment. Psychological Bulletin, 1987,101:75-90.
  • 10Judd C. M., Park B. Definition and assessment of accuracy in social stereotypes. Psychological Review, 1993,100:109-128.

共引文献49

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部