期刊文献+

基于住院病案首页数据的心血管临床专科评估框架构建 被引量:14

Construction of Cardiovascular Clinical Specialty Evaluation Framework Based on the First Page of Inpatient Record
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的在原卫生部确定的重点临床专科评价方案的基础上,构建基于住院病案首页数据的心血管临床专科评估框架。方法在3个评价维度下,依据原卫生部《三级综合医院医疗质量管理与控制指标(2011年版)》,参考国内外心血管临床专科评估方法和评价指标,结合心血管临床专科特点和住院病案首页实际数据情况,运用名义群体法确定评估框架。结果确定心血管临床专科疾病谱和手术/操作谱,确定心血管临床专科重点疾病和重点手术/操作,建立心血管临床专科评估框架,其中一级指标3个,二级指标10个,三级指标20个。结论基于住院病案首页数据建立心血管临床专科评估框架是可行、客观的。 Objective Based on the key clinical evaluation program of former Ministry of Public Health,to establish an evaluation framework of cardiovascular clinical specialty,which is based on the first page of inpatient record. Methods Under the three evaluation dimensions,selecting evaluation indicators for cardiovascular clinical specialty according to the Medical Quality Management and Control Indicators of General Hospitals(2011) published by former Ministry of Public Health and clinical indicators used by main international organizations,and combining with the characteristics of cardiovascular clinical specialty and data elements of the first page of inpatient record,and establishing an evaluation framework by the Nominal Group Technique. Results The spectrum of diseases of cardiovascular clinical specialty is determined. The spectrum of surgeries and procedures of cardiovascular clinical specialty are confirmed. An evaluation framework of cardiovascular clinical specialty,including 3 first class indicators,10 second class indicators and 20 third class indicators,are established. Conclusion Establishing an evaluation framework of cardiovascular clinical specialty by the hospitalization summary reports is viable and objective.
作者 宋景晨 马谢民 赵乐平 陈彤 徐锡武 潘琦 袁启峰 周传坤 SONG Jing-chen;MA Xie-min;ZHAO Le-ping(National Geriatrics Center/Beijing Hospital, Beijing, 100730, China)
出处 《中国医院管理》 北大核心 2018年第5期31-33,共3页 Chinese Hospital Management
关键词 住院病案首页 心血管临床专科 评估框架 the first page of inpatient record, cardiovascular clinical specialty, evaluation framework
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献55

  • 1ACHS Clinical Indicator Results for Auslralia and New Zealand 1998 -2005, Delermining the Potential In hnprove Qualily of Care: 7th Edilinn[OL].[2008-12-16].http://www. achs.org.au/eireporls/.
  • 2ACHS Performance and Outcomes Service2006 lnformationPackage[OL].[2008- 12- 16].http://surveyor.achs.org. au/pdf/ACHS_POS_In formation_ Paekage_2006.pdf.
  • 3Ansari MZ, Ackland MJ. Jolley DJ, et al. Inter-hospital comparison of mortality rates[J].Int J Qual Health Care. 1999( 11 ): 29-35.
  • 4Lagasse, RS, Steinberg ES, Katz RJ, et al. Defining quality of perioperative care by statistical process control of adverse outecomes[J]. Anesthesiology, 1995(82): 1181-1188.
  • 5Olmsted M, Murphy J, Geisen E, et ol. Methodology: U.S. news & world report best hospitals 2013--2014[R]. NC: RTI International, 2013.
  • 6GreenLand P, Alpert J, Belier G, et al. 2010 ACCF/AHA guide- lines for assessment of cardiovascular risk in asymptomatic adults : a report of the Amefiean College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines[J]. Circulation, 2010, 122: 2748-2764.
  • 7Ageney for Healtheare Research and Quality. National heahhcare quali- ty report [R]. Roekville: U.S. Department of Health and Human Set-vice, 2012.
  • 8OECD Cardiac Care Panel. Selecting indicators for the quality of car- diac care at the health systems level in OECD countries[R]. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperations and Development, 2004.
  • 9Kerr E, Asch S, Hamilton E, et al. Quality of care for cardiopul- monary conditions. A review of the literature and quality indicators [R]. Santa Monica: RAND Health, 2000.
  • 10Australian Council on Healthcare Standards (ACHS). Australasian clinical indicator report 2004--2011: 13th edition[R]. Sydney: ACHS. 2012.

共引文献32

同被引文献93

引证文献14

二级引证文献71

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部