期刊文献+

神经电生理检测对小脑脑桥角区肿瘤术后面神经功能的预测价值 被引量:12

Predictive value of neurophysiological monitoring in facial nerve function after cerebellopontine angle tumor surgery
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 探讨术前及术中神经电生理检测指标对小脑脑桥角(CPA)区肿瘤术后面神经功能的预测价值.方法 回顾性分析2016年8月至2017年3月首都医科大学附属北京天坛医院神经外科收治的58例CPA区肿瘤患者的临床资料.患者术前均行瞬目反射及面神经F波检测,对瞬目反射的R1波潜伏期及F波的平均潜伏期结果进行分级.术中均采用面肌运动诱发电位(FMEP)保护面神经功能,记录FMEP波幅的比值.依据House-Brackmann(H-B)评分标准分别于术前1d、术后1周、3个月及6个月评估面神经功能.采用多因素Lotistic回归分析术后面神经功能的影响因素.结果 58例CPA区肿瘤患者均经乙状窦后入路切除肿瘤,其中55例获得肿瘤全切除(94.8%),3例肿瘤行次全切除.单因素Logistic回归分析显示,术后1周、3个月及6个月面神经功能结局良好组患者的瞬目反射结果优于结局不良组(均P<0.05).术后6个月面神经功能结局良好组的F波反应检测结果优于结局不良组(P<0.05).术后3个月及6个月面神经功能结局良好组的肿瘤最大径小于结局不良组[(31.9±10.2)mm、(31.9±9.3)mm对比(37.8±9.7)mm、(40.0±10.0)mm](均P<0.05).术后1周、3个月及6个月面神经功能结局良好组的FMEP波幅比值高于结局不良组[(84.6±21.3)%、(83.0±19.0)%、(81.0±19.1)%对比(66.2±27.0)%、(63.4±29.0)%、(59.6±31.2)%](均P<0.05).多因素Logistic回归分析显示,FMEP波幅比值为预测术后1周、3个月及6个月面神经功能结局的独立预测因素,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).肿瘤最大径为3个月及6个月面神经功能的独立预测因素(P<0.05);瞬目反射结果分级是术后6个月面神经功能的独立预测因素(P<0.05).ROC曲线分析,FMEP波幅比值预测术后1周、3个月及6个月面神经功能良好的截点值分别为89.2%、58.2%、58.2%;曲线下面积分别为0.709、0.706、0.713.结论 瞬目反射及肿瘤最大径对术后远期面神经功能有一定的预测价值.FMEP波幅比值对术后面神经功能有良好的预测价值,波幅比值>60%预测术后远期面神经功能结局良好.  Objective To investigate the predictive value of preoperative and intraoperative electrophysiological parameters in facial nerve (FN) function after cerebellopontine angel (CPA) tumor surgery.Methods A total of 58 patients with CPA tumor underwent operations from August 2016 to March 2017 at Department of Neurosurgery,Beijing Tiantan Hospital,Capital Medical University and were enrolled into this retrospective study.Preoperative blink reflex (BR) and FN F wave response were tested in all patients.The R1 component latency and mean F wave latency were determined.Intraoperative facial motor evoked potentials (FMEP) was applied to monitor the FN function and the amplitude ratio of FMEP was documented.According to the House-Brackmann (H-B) grading system,the functional classification of FN was determined preoperatively,at 1 week,3 months and 6 months postoperatively.Multiple logistic regression analysis was applied to explore the predictor of postoperative FN function.Results A total of 58 cases of CPA tumor underwent microsurgical excisions by retrosigmoid approach.Total and subtotal resections were performed in 55 (94.8%) and 3 cases,respectively.Single factor Logistic regression analysis showed that the results of blink reflex in patients with good FN outcome were better than those in the group with poor outcome at 3 follow-up time points (P 〈 0.05).The results of F wave response in patients with good FN outcome were better than those in poor outcome group at 6 months post operation (P 〈 0.05).At 3 and 6 months post surgery,the maximal tumor diameters in the good outcome group were (31.9 ± 10.2) mm and (31.9 ± 9.3) mm,respectively,which were smaller than those in the poor outcome group [(37.8 ±9.7) mm and (40.0 ± 10.0) mm,respectively] (both P 〈0.05).At 1 week,3 and 6 months post surgery,the FMEP amplitude ratios in the good outcome group were (84.6 ±21.3)%,(83.0 ± 19.0)% and (81.0 ± 19.1)%,respectively,which were higher than those in the poor outcome group [(66.2 ± 27.0) %,(63.4 ± 29.0) % and (59.6 ± 31,2) %] (all P 〈 0.05).Multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that FMEP amplitude ratio was the independent predictor of FN outcome at 1 week,3 and 6 months post operation (P 〈 0.05).The maximal tumor diameter was the independent predictor of FN outcome at 3 and 6 months post operation (P 〈 0.05).BR classification was the independent predictor of FN outcome at 6 months after operation (P 〈 0.05).ROC (receiver operating characteristic) curve analysis showed that the FMEP amplitude ratio cut-off values of 89.2% [AUC (area under the curve) =0.709],58.2% (AUC =0.706) and 58.2% (AUC =0.713) predicted good FN function at 1 week,3 and 6 months after surgery,respectively.Conclusions BR and maximal tumor diameter have certain predictive values for postoperative FN function.The FMEP amplitude ratio is a valuable predictor for postoperative FN function and its value of at least 60% is predictive of favorable long-term postoperative FN function.
作者 凌苗 乔慧 贾旺 贾桂军 杨晓翠 陶晓蓉 李萍 刘洋 Ling Miao;Qiao Hui;Jia Wang;Jia Guijun;Yang Xiaocui;Tao Xiaorong;Li Ping;Liu Yang(Beijing Neurosurgical Institute, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China)
出处 《中华神经外科杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2018年第4期383-387,共5页 Chinese Journal of Neurosurgery
关键词 小脑脑桥角 脑肿瘤 面神经 电生理学 预测 Cerebellopontine angle Brain neoplasms Facial nerve Electrophysiology Forecasting
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献21

  • 1Fukuda M, Oishi M, Takao T, et al. Facial nerve motor-evoked potential monitoring during skull base surgery predicts facial nerve outcome [ J ]. J Neurol Neumsurg Psychiatry, 2008,79 : 1066-1070.
  • 2Cosetti MK, Xu M, Rivera A, et al. Intraoperative transcranial motor-evoked potential monitoring of the facial nerve during cerebellopontine angle tumor resection[ JJ. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base,2012,73:308-315.
  • 3Matthies C, Raslan F, Schweitzer T, et al. Facial motor evoked potentials in cerebellopontine angle surgery:technique, pitfalls and predictive value [ J ]. Clin Neurol Neurosurg, 2011, 113 : 872-879.
  • 4Lin VY, Houlden D, Bethune A, et al. A novel method in pr- edicting immediate postoperative facial nerve function post acoustic neuroma excision [ J J. Otol Neurotol, 2006, 27: 1017-1022.
  • 5Sarnthein J, Hejrati N, Neidert MC, et al. Facial nerve motorevoked potentials during skull base surgery to monitor facial nerve function using the threshold-level method [ J ]. Neurosurg Focus, 2013,34 : E7.
  • 6Dong CC, Macdonald DB, Akagami R, et al. Intraoperative facial motor evoked potential monitoring with transcranial electrical stimulation during skull base surgery [ J ]. Clin Neurophysiol, 2005,116:588-596.
  • 7Acioly MA, Gharabaghi A, Liebsch M, et al. Quantitative para- meters of facial motor evoked potential during vestibular schwannoma surgery predict postoperative facial nerve function [ J ]. Acta Neurochir (Wien) ,2011,153 : 1169-1179.
  • 8Acioly MA, Liebsch M, de Aguiar PH, et al. Facial nerve mo- nitoring during cerebellopontine angle and skull base tumor surgery : a systematic review from description to current success on function prediction [ J]. World Neurosurg,2013,80 : e271-300.
  • 9Verst SM, Chung TM, Sucena AC, et al. Comparison between the C5 or C6-Cz electrode assembly and C3 or CA-Cz assembly for transcranial electric motor activation of muscular response of the contralateral facial nerve [ J ]. Acta Neumchir ( Wien ), 2012, 154:2229-2235.
  • 10V. Deletis.What does intraoperative monitoring of motor evoked potentials bring to the neurosurgeon?[J].Acta Neurochirurgica.2005(10)

共引文献19

同被引文献71

引证文献12

二级引证文献34

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部