司法改革视野下陪审程序选择权之完善——以A市试点法院为分析样本

Under the Field Vision of the Judicial Reform to Perfect the Optional Right of Procedure of the Jury——Take the Pilot Court of A City as the Analysis Sample

当前,由于存在着法院在陪审程序启动方面掌握主动权,以及社会公众对陪审程序选择权认知程度低等情况,当事人的陪审选择权得不到行使,法院因其实用与功利主义价值取向而抹杀当事人的诉求利益等问题突出。于此,应改变现有的陪审程序"二元发动机制",将陪审程序决定权赋予当事人、让当事人监督法官的释明义务以及参与个案陪审员的选择过程,以此来达到当事人能充分行使陪审程序选择权之目的。

At present, due to the fact that the court has the initiative in starting the jury process and the public has a low awareness of the jury option. The litigant＇s choice of jury is not exercised, and the court has the problem of obliterating the appeals interests of the parties due to their practical and utilitarian values. Here, only by changing the ＂ double starting-mechanism ＂ of the existing jury system, giving the determining right of the jury system to the parties, letting the parties supervise the interpretation of the judges and participate in the process of selecting jurors. In this way, the parties can fully exercise the purpose of the choice of jury procedure.