惩罚性赔偿制度在消法领域的适用研究

Adaptive research of the system of punitive damage in the field of consumption

无论是法律学者还是司法工作人员,对我国惩罚性赔偿制度中的"欺诈"的概念,都无法达成统一的认识。在举证责任这一制度的适用上,虽然新消法对部分商品的举证责任倒置进步性地作出了规定,但在实践中仍然有不足。现结合相关案例,确保司法部门的裁判结果达到法律效果和社会效果的统一。从《消费者权益保护法》惩罚性赔偿制度的欺诈行为及《消费者权益保护法》惩罚性赔偿制度的举证责任倒置进行了分析。

＂Fraud＂ from punitive damages for consumer protection,no matter the relevant laws or the legal schoolar does not have the identical explanation of definition.In the aspect of the burden of proof,China＇s new consumer protection makes significant progress. Through parts of goods belong to reversion of burden of proof,the system of revesion of burden of proof has shortcomings in practise.Combine the relevant case, the notion of fraud should mainly consider the purpose of the contract, about the burden of proof, the range and time of application should give the specific explanation, which could have the unified effect of the legal and society.