期刊文献+

浅析二战后美国联邦政府高等教育问责政策

An Analysis on Accountability Policy to Higher Education of US Federal Government after World War Ⅱ
下载PDF
导出
摘要 美国联邦政府对大学的问责经历了20世纪70年代之前的几乎不过问,到70年代开始间接督促表现,90年代逐步直接监督成本,到21世纪以来开始直接全面关注大学效益的历史进程。这一历史演变进程体现了:在保障大学自治的前提下,联邦政府对大学的问责正变得越来越直接与全面;问责理念经历大学是独立主体到大学是教育过程的转变;对学生与家长负责,是联邦政府问责大学的主要目的所在。 The accountability policy of the US federal government to universities has experiencedsuch historical evolution process as little supervision before the 1970s, indirectly supervising perfor-mance from the 1970s, supervising the costs directly in the 1990s, and paying full attention to universi-ty benefits in the 21st century. It reflects the fact that under the precondition of ensuring university au-tonomy, the federal government’s accountability policy to the university is becoming more and more di-rect and comprehensive; the concept of accountability is changed to that the university is an education-al process, not an independent subject; the main purpose of the federal government's accountability tothe university is responsible for students and parents.
作者 吴海燕 Wu Haiyan(School of Medicine, Taizbou University, Taizhou 318000, Zhejiang, China)
机构地区 台州学院医学院
出处 《台州学院学报》 2018年第1期61-65,共5页 Journal of Taizhou University
基金 2017年度浙江省社科联研究课题(编号为2017N18)的成果
关键词 美国 联邦政府 问责大学 历史演进 US federal government accountability to university historical evolution
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献17

  • 1蔡国春.美国高等教育发展进程中的院校研究[J].清华大学教育研究,2004,25(4):34-42. 被引量:23
  • 2黄志广,张淑林.国外大学评估及其对我国的借鉴意义[J].中国高教研究,2005(11):53-54. 被引量:3
  • 3孟宣廷,袁永红.论高等教育的社会评估[J].理工高教研究,2005,24(6):19-20. 被引量:3
  • 4张碧晖.大学评估应坚持同行评议的原则[N].科学时报,2009-02-03.
  • 5马克·布劳格.经济学方法论[M].北京:商务印书馆,1992.86.
  • 6M. W. Peterson. (1985) Institutional Research: A Evolutionary Perspective. M. Corcorran & M. W. Peterson. Institutional Reserch in Transition. New Direction for Institutional Research, No.46. San Francisco: Jossey-bass, Inc, 1985.
  • 7Berdahl,R. O. ( 1971 ). Statewide Coordination of Higher Education. Washington, DC:ACE.
  • 8M. W. Peterson. The Role of Institutional Research: From Improvement to Redesign. New Directions for Institutional Research, No.104. San Francisco: Josseey---Bass, Inc. 1999.
  • 9Burke,2002,2005a; National Commission on Accountability in Higher Education, 2005.
  • 10Burke, J. & Minassian, H. (2003). Real Accountability or Accountability "lite": Seventh Annual Survey, 2003.3,3,5. Albany, NY: Rockefeller Institute of Government.

共引文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部