期刊文献+

银行业系统性风险监测预警体系与防控机制研究 被引量:8

The Early-warning System and Prevention Mechanism of Banking Systemic Risk
下载PDF
导出
摘要 金融危机爆发后,各国际监管组织和主要国家普遍加强了对系统性金融风险的研究和监管。近年来,我国银行业在规模体量、组织体系、架构布局、业务模式、跨国经营等方面发生了巨大变化,机构之间的关联性、渗透性、交互性增强,风险的系统性上升。本文在借鉴、吸纳既往研究成果的基础上,分析并提出了银行业系统性风险的内外二元生成机制,阐述了银行业系统性风险形成的内在机理;聚焦经济风险、信用风险、流动性风险、市场风险、关联风险等五大风险源,深入分析可能诱发银行业系统性风险的主要因素及其传导机制;运用熵值法测度指标权重,进而构建银行业系统性风险评价指数。实证检验表明,BAI指数和BPI指数具有较好的评价预警效果。最后,本文分析提出了防控银行业系统性风险的四项机制:健全宏观审慎管理体系;筑牢风险防控基础屏障;着力强化系统性风险监管;健全问题机构处置机制。 After the outbreak of the global ?nancial crisis, international regulatory organizations and major countries generally strengthened the study and regulation of systemic risks. In recent years, China's banking industry has undergone tremendous changes in terms of scale, organization system, architecture layout, business models, and transnational operation, and the relevance, permeability and interaction of the institutions have been enhanced, systematicness of the risks has risen. On the basis of drawing lessons from previous research results, this paper proposes the principle of "duality generation mechanism", expounds the inner mechanism of the formation of the banking systemic risk. It focuses on economic risk, credit risk, liquidity risk, market risk to analyze main factors and transmission mechanism of the current banking systemic risks. This paper develops an evaluation and early-warning system using the entropy method to measure the weight of indicators. The effectiveness tests show that the BAI index and BPI index have a good evaluation of early warning effect. Finally, this paper proposes four mechanisms to prevent and control the banking systemic risk: improving the macro-prudential management system, building foundational barriers, strengthening systemic risk supervision and improving disposal mechanisms for problem institutions.
作者 朱贺 张秀民
出处 《金融监管研究》 北大核心 2018年第4期71-86,共16页 Financial Regulation Research
关键词 银行业系统性风险 熵值法 风险预警 风险防控 Banking Systemic Risk Entropy Method Risk Early-warning Risk Prevention and Control
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献16

  • 1刘春航.金融体系脆弱性评估,BLISHER框架的构建与应用.比较,2011,.
  • 2Elsinger, H. , A. Lehar, and M. Summer, 2006, "Risk Assessment for Banking Systems," Management Science, Vol. 52, No. 9, pp. 1301 -1314.
  • 3Fitch rating, 2005, "Assessing Bank: Systemic Risk: A New Product," Criteria Report.
  • 4Fitch rating, 2009, "Bank Systemic Risk Report," Special Report.
  • 5IMF, 2009, "Global Stability Report---Responding to the Financial Crisis and Measuring Systemic Risks," working paper.
  • 6Marquez J. , Canedo D. , and Jaramillo S. M. , 2009, "A network model of systemic risk : stress testing, the banking system, " Intelligent systems in accounting, finance and management, No. 16. , pp. 87 - 110.
  • 7Michiel Bijlsma, Jeroen Klomp and Sijmen Duineveld, 2007, "Systemic risk in the financial sector- A review and synthesis," working paper, No. 210.
  • 8Minderhoud K. , 2006, "Systemic risk in the Dutch financial sector," De Economist, Vol. 154, No. 2, pp. 177 - 195.
  • 9Oesterreichische Nationalbank, 2006, "Risk Assessment and Stress Testing for the Austrian Banking System--Model Documentation", working paper.
  • 10Piergiorgio Alessandri, Prasanna Gai, Sujit Kapadia, Nada Mora, and Claus Puhr, 2009, "Towards a Framework for Quantifying Systemic Stability," International Journal of Central Banking, September 5 ( 3 ).

共引文献78

同被引文献73

引证文献8

二级引证文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部