期刊文献+

蛛网膜下隙与连续硬膜外联合阻滞麻醉在剖宫产中的应用 被引量:4

Subarachnoid Space and Continuous Epidural Block Anesthesia in Cesarean Section
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的了解对剖宫产产妇选用蛛网膜下隙与连续硬膜外联合阻滞麻醉、持续硬膜外麻醉的效果。方法选取2015年9月—2017年11月本院接收且行剖宫产治疗的162例产妇作为研究对象,采用随机法,将其分成两组:81例行硬膜外麻醉的为对照组,81例行蛛网膜下隙与连续硬膜外联合麻醉的为治疗组,对比两组产妇的应用效果。结果治疗组麻醉优良率100.00%,较对照组的83.95%高,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组患者的麻醉时长、新生儿出生后(1 min、5 min)评分等对比,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论对剖宫产产妇选蛛网膜下隙与连续硬膜外联合麻醉,麻醉效果显著。 Objective To investigate the efect of continuous subarachnoid space combined with continuous epidural anesthesia and continuous epidural anesthesia for cesarean section. Methods A total of 162 maternal women received caesarean section in our hospital from September 2015 to November 2017 were randomly divided into two groups 81 women in the control group received epidural anesthesia and 81 women in the subarachnoid space In combination with continuous epidural anesthesia for the treatment group, compared with two groups effect. Results The excellent and good rate of anesthesia in the treatment group was 100.00%, which was higher than 83.95% in the control group (P 〈 0.05). There was a statistically signifcant diference between the two groups in the duration of anesthesia and neonatal birth (1 min, 5 min) score (P 〈 0.05). Conclusion For cesarean section, the combination of subarachnoid space and continuous epidural anesthesia is efective.
作者 汤永生 TANG Yongsheng(Department of Anesthesia, Pizhou City Maternity and Children Health Care Center, Xuzhou Jiangsu 221300, China)
出处 《中国继续医学教育》 2018年第15期71-73,共3页 China Continuing Medical Education
关键词 蛛网膜下隙 连续硬膜外麻醉 阻滞麻醉 持续硬膜外麻醉 剖宫产 麻醉效果 subarachnoid space continuous epidural anesthesia blocked anesthesia continuous epidural anesthesia cesarean section anesthetic efect
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献78

  • 1朱春仙,陈宏,黄荷凤.剖宫产术时两种麻醉方式的对比研究[J].中华妇产科杂志,2005,40(4):253-255. 被引量:22
  • 2廖实红,袁从顺.硬膜外阻滞剖宫产中寒战发生时机及原因的探讨[J].临床麻醉学杂志,1996,12(5):267-267. 被引量:48
  • 3米勒.米勒麻醉学[M].曾因明,邓小明.译.6版.北京:北京大学出版社.2006:352.
  • 4Choi D H, Kim J A, Chung I S. Comparison of combined spinal an- esthesia and epidural anesthesia for cesarean section [ J]. Acta An- aesth Scand,2004,44(2) :214 -9.
  • 5Saravanakumar K, Rao S G, Cooper G M. The challengers of obesity and obstetric anesthesia[ J ]. Curr Opin Obstet Gynccol, 2006,18 (6) :631 -5.
  • 6Bahk J H,Kim J H, Lee J S, et al. Computed tomography study of the lumbar( L3 -4 ) epidural depth and its relationship to physical measurements in young adult men [ J ]. Reg Anesth Pain Med, 1998,23(3) :262 -5.
  • 7Obasuyi B I, Fyneface-Ogan S, Mato C N. A comparison of the haemodynamic effects of lateral and sitting positions during induc- tion of spinal anaesthesia for caesarean [ J]. Int J Obstet Anesth, 2013,22(2) :124 -8.
  • 8Coppejans H C, Hendrickx E, Goossens J, et al. The sitting ver- sia for cesarean delivery: block characteristics and severity of hy- sus right lateral position during combined spinal-epidural anesthe- potension [ J ]. Anesth Analg,2006,102 (1) :243 -7.
  • 9Choi DH, Kim JA, Chung LS. Comparison of combined spinal anesthesia and epidural anesthesia for cesarean section. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 2000;44:214-219.
  • 10Derya Arslan Yurtlu,Kadir Kaya.Ropivacaine, Articaine or Combination of Ropivacaine and Articaine for Epidural Anesthesia in Cesarean Section: a Randomized, Prospective, Double-Blinded Study[J]. Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology . 2013 (1)

共引文献206

同被引文献32

引证文献4

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部