期刊文献+

“智能投顾”的本质及规制路径 被引量:51

A Study on the Legal Regulation of “Robo-advisers”
原文传递
导出
摘要 人工智能深刻地影响着传统投资顾问业的发展方向,"智能投顾"脱胎于投资咨询业,却逐渐偏离了以"投资咨询"为核心的传统模式,已成为以"资产管理"为核心的新型模式。我国欠缺针对投资顾问的高位阶立法,难以形成对"智能投顾"的有效监管。"智能投顾"在本质上是投资信托,引入信托法作为实定法解释工具,可以夯实规制智能投顾的法理基础,缓和立法缺位、规范无据和监管错位等问题。在此前提下,智能投顾经营者应当建立内部利益冲突防范机制,妥善解决与投资者之间的利益冲突,在立法上应当明确智能投顾经营者承担受托人的信义义务,监管机关应当设置单独的牌照管理规则,以期提升法律规制的有效性。 Investment advisory services are profoundly impacted by the technology ot Artlh- cial Intelligence, which evolved from "Artificial advisers" to "Robo - advisers". In financial market," Robo - advisers" are no longer just a traditional financial service of investment consult- ing, but has become into a new complex financial business which is mainly focused on private as- set management. However, since there is no law specifically for investment advisory services in China, there are numerous legal impediments to gum up an efficient regulation of "Robo -advis- ers". General speaking, considered "Robo- advisers" always act as trustee in an investment trust relationship, an introduction of Trust Law as legal interpretation tool for "Robo -advisers" can reinforce the basis of legal regulation. The paper is aimed to build a legal framework which is suitable for the regulation of "Robo- advisers".
作者 吴烨 叶林 Wu Ye;Ye Lin
出处 《法学杂志》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第5期16-28,共13页 Law Science Magazine
关键词 智能投顾 信托 资产管理 信义义务 robo - adviser trustee asset management fiduciary duty
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献42

  • 1谈李荣.银行信托义务的法律构建——以英美银行为视角的分析[J].财经科学,2006(11):39-44. 被引量:3
  • 2郑瑞琨.信托法与物权法定原则的冲突及其解决[J].政法论坛,2007,25(4):78-87. 被引量:10
  • 3深圳证券交易所综合研究所市场研究组研究报告.我国证券投资咨询问题研究[R].2007年9月26日.
  • 4庄月清主持.保护投资人免于遭受市场中介机构利益冲突行为所引起的损害之适当法规架构[R].台湾证券交易所委托研究计划期末报告.2011年3月28日.
  • 5彭冰.从Lowe案看美国对投资顾问的界定,张育军主编.《证券法苑》第一卷,法律出版社,2009年9月第一版.
  • 6国际证监会组织(IOSCO): Guidance for Efficient Regulation of Conflicts of Interest Facing Market Intermediaries, 2010年10月.
  • 7Steven W.Hansen.Developments in The Federal Regulation of Investment Advisers.Bingham McCutchen LIP.Oct.2008.
  • 8Guidance for Efficient Regulation of Conflicts of Interest Facing Market Intermediaries",http://www.seep.gov.pk/Reports/Conflicts%20ol%20Interest%20Final%20report%20IOSCO.pdf.
  • 9武俊桥:《证券市场投资者适当性原则初探》,载《证券法苑》(第三册),法律出版社2010年12月版,第131页、.
  • 10BIS, Customer Suitability in the Retail Sale of Financial Products and Services, April, 2008, at4.

共引文献319

同被引文献398

引证文献51

二级引证文献293

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部