认罪认罚从宽与台湾地区刑事协商之比较研究

Comparative Research on the Leniency on Admission of Guilty and Acceptance of Punishment in China's Mainland and the Criminal Negotiation Procedure in Taiwan Region

我国台湾地区在接受"改良式当事人进行主义"后,又于2004年4月引进了刑事协商程序。大陆地区当前试点之认罪认罚从宽制度与我国台湾地区刑事协商程序在适用范围、当事人权利保障及具体程序运作等方面存在差异。对于认罪认罚从宽制度而言,刑事协商程序有可借鉴之处,但更要总结其经验教训。为避免出现理论根基不稳、实践效果不彰的现象,认罪认罚从宽制度应当充分调动控辩双方积极性、强化对犯罪嫌疑人及被告人的认罪自愿性审查、明确值班律师的定位。

After accepting ＂the adversary system in improving type＂, Taiwan region intro- duced the criminal negotiation procedure in April 2004. The difference between the leniency on admission of guilty and acceptance of punishment in China's Mainland and criminal negotiation pro- cedure in terms of scope of application, protection of parties＇ rights and operation of specific pro- cedures. For the leniency on admission of guilty and acceptance of punishment, it is needed to sum up the experience and lessons of criminal negotiation procedure. In order to avoid the phe- nomenon that the theoretical foundation is unstable and the practice is ineffective, the leniency on admission of guilty and acceptance of punishment should fully mobilize the positivity of both pros- ecution and defense, strengthen the review of suspects and defendants＇ voluntariness, and clarify the position of the duty lawyer.