期刊文献+

跨境网络消费者合同强制性仲裁条款效力研究 被引量:8

Research on the Validity of Mandatory Arbitration Clause in Cross-Border Consumer Contracts
原文传递
导出
摘要 随着我国跨境电子商务发展得如火如荼,跨境网络消费者已经成为一个不可忽视的群体。如何在新的技术条件下维护跨境网络消费者的合法权益,已经受到广泛关注。经营者为维护自身利益,普遍在跨境互联网消费合同中订立强制性仲裁条款。从形式上看,强制性仲裁条款属于格式条款,且经营者往往并未履行充分提示义务;从实质上看,一方面强制性仲裁条款利用国际商事仲裁的特点加重消费者负担,另一方面规避跨境集体诉讼妨碍消费者维护自身合法权益,因此,在法律上应判定跨境互联网消费者合同中的强制性仲裁条款无效。 The group of consumers relating to International Internet should not be ignored in the context of the development of International B2C career in China. It is necessary to concentrate people' s attention on the protection of the legal rights of the B2C consumers. Mandatory arbitra- tion clauses always been concluded in International Internet B2C contracts for the sake of busines- ses themselves. In form, mandatory arbitration clause has the characteristic of Standard Terms, however, business seldom fulfills the obligation of giving a reasonable alert and explanation. In essence, the burden of consumers has been added in light of the features of International commer- cial arbitration on the one hand, on the other hand, through the mandatory arbitration clause, cross -border class action could be circumvented. For all the reasons stated, Mandatory arbitra- tion clauses in International Internet consumer contracts should be deemed legally invalidity.
作者 魏求月 Wei Qiuyue
出处 《法学杂志》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第5期122-130,共9页 Law Science Magazine
基金 中国政法大学博士生创新基金项目"国际电子商务纠纷管辖权问题研究"(项目编号:2016BSCX16)的阶段性成果
关键词 强制性仲裁条款 超链接合同 点击合同 集体诉讼 mandatory arbitration clause browse - wrap agreements clicking agreements class litigation
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献44

  • 1法律社.《元照英美法词典》[M].,2003..
  • 2Harvard Law Review Association, Developments in the Law-Class Action, Harvard Law Review, May, 1976.
  • 3Abraham L. Pomerantz, New Developments in Class Actions-Has Their Death Knell Been Sounded? 25 Bus. Law. 1259, 1970.
  • 4Richard B. Cappalli and Claudio Consolo, Class Actions for Continental Europe? A Preliminary Inquiry, 6 Temp. Int' l & Comp. L.J. 217, Fall, 1992.
  • 5Abraham L. Pomerantz, New Developments in Class Actions-Has Their Death Knell Been Sounded? 25 Bus. Law. 1259,1970 .
  • 6Market St. Ry. Co. v. Railroad Commission, 171 P. 2d 875(Cal. 1946).
  • 7Richard O. Faulk, Armageddon through Aggregation? The Use and Abuse of Class Actions in International Dispute Resolution, in Charles E. F. Rickett and Thomas G. W. Teller (ed.) , International Perspectives on Consumers' Access to Justice, 2003.
  • 8Richard O. Faulk, Armageddon through Aggregation? The Use and Abuse of Class Actions in International Dispute Resolution, in Charles E. F. Rickett and Thomas G. W. Telfer (ed.) , International Perspectives on Consumers' Access to Justice, 2003.
  • 9Richard O. Faulk, Armageddon through Aggregation? The Use and Abuse of Class Actions in International Dispute Resolution, in Charles E. F. Rickett and Thomas G. W. Telfer (ed.), International Perspectives on Consumers' Access to Justice, 2003.
  • 10Kerry Barnett, Equitable Trusts: An Effective Remedy in Consumer Class Actions, 96 Yale L.J. 1591, June, 1987.

共引文献51

同被引文献103

引证文献8

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部