期刊文献+

中国动态拨备制度的实施效果评价 被引量:5

Evaluation of the Implementation Effect of China's Dynamic Provisioning
下载PDF
导出
摘要 顺应国际金融监管改革趋势,中国于2011年正式引入动态拨备制度。然而,目前该制度实施周期较短,仍处于不断探索与完善阶段,实施效果有待科学评价。本文总结了中国动态拨备制度的整体框架和基本设置,在明确动态拨备制度理念和目标的基础上,运用指标数据分析和实证分析相结合,考察了中国动态拨备制度的总体实施效果。结果表明,虽然中国银行业和选取的代表性商业银行基本达到了动态拨备的监管标准,但制度的实施并没有发挥出统计上显著的逆周期特征,而且还存在商业银行利用动态拨备进行资本操纵和利润平滑的现象。对此,本文借鉴国际成功经验,有针对性地提出了完善动态拨备制度的政策建议。 In accordance with the international trend in financial supervision reform, China officially started to implement dynamic provisioning in 2011. However, since it has been implemented for a relatively short period of time, the system needs to be improved on the basis of sufficient investigation and research, and in particular, the effect of the implementation needs to be evaluated. This paper tries to describe the overall framework and basic set-up of China's dynamic provisioning system. Based on a clear description of the concept and objectives of dynamic provisioning, the analyses of the indicator data and empirical data are applied to investigate the overall implementation effect of dynamic provisioning. The results show that although the Chinese banking industry and the commercial banks selected for observation have met the basic regulatory standards of dynamic provisioning, but the implementation of dynamic provisioning does not show a statistically significant countercyclicality. Furthermore, some commercial banks also take the advantage of dynamic provisioning to manipulate capital and smooth profits. In this regard, this paper puts forward some policy suggestions to improve the dynamic provisioning system by drawing on the successful international experience.
作者 刘淼 许珍慧 LIU Miao;XU Zhen-hui
出处 《南京师大学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第3期63-71,共9页 Journal of Nanjing Normal University(Social Science Edition)
基金 国家社科基金项目(15BGJ039)的阶段性成果
关键词 动态拨备制度 效果评价 逆周期性 资本操纵 利润平滑 dynamic provisioning system effect evaluation countercyclicality capital manipulation profitsmoothing
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献58

  • 1孙天琦,杨岚.有关银行贷款损失准备制度的调查报告——以我国五家上市银行为例的分析[J].金融研究,2005(6):116-130. 被引量:64
  • 2陈昆亭,龚六堂.粘滞价格模型以及对中国经济的数值模拟——对基本RBC模型的改进[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2006,23(8):106-117. 被引量:151
  • 3Balla E, McKenna A. Dynamic provisioning: A countercyclical tool for loan loss reserves[R]. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond Economic Quarterly, 2009, 95(4):383 -418.
  • 4Bikker J A, Metzemakers P A. Bank provisioning behaviour and procyclicality[J]. International Financial Market, Institutions and Money, 2005, 15:141-157.
  • 5Bouvatier V, Lepetit L. Banks' procyclicality behavior: Does provisioning matter? [R]. Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne Working Paper No. 8174,2006.
  • 6Burroni M, Quagliariello M, Sabatini E, Tola V. Dynamic provisioning: Rationale, functioning,and prudential treatment[R]. Bank of Italy Working Paper No. 57,2009.
  • 7Cavallo M, Majnoni G. Do banks provision for bad loans in good times? Empirical evidence and policy implications [R]. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 2619,2001.
  • 8Evan Kraft. Dynamic provisioning.- Results of an initial feasibility study for Croatia[R]. Banking Supervisors of Central and Eastern Europe Conference, 2004.
  • 9Jimenez G ,Saurina G. Credit cycles, credit risk, and prudential regulation[J]. International Journal of Central Banking, 2006,2 : 65-98.
  • 10Laeven L, Majnoni G. Loan loss provisioning and economic slow downs: Too much, too late? [ J]. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 2003,12: 178- 197.

共引文献32

引证文献5

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部