期刊文献+

跨期选择研究:从单时点结果到多时点结果 被引量:3

Research on intertemporal choice:From single dated outcomes to multiple dated outcomes
下载PDF
导出
摘要 跨期选择是人们对不同时间点的损益做出判断和选择的过程。随着对单时点结果跨期选择心理过程的认识日趋一致,研究者开始加强对多时点结果跨期选择的研究。本文总结了多时点跨期选择研究,尤其是近来出现的一些理论,包括:序列模型(sequences model)、基于理由(reason-based)的理论、突显性解释(salience account)和权衡模型(trade off model),并指出未来研究可以开展的一些方向:包括比较和融合不同的理论、拓展研究的领域和应用眼动追踪技术进行过程研究。 Intertemporal choice refers to any decision that requires tradeoffs among outcomes that occur at different times. With an increasing consensus on the psychological process for choices between single dated outcomes, an increasing amount of research focuses on choices between multiple dated outcomes. This paper reviews theories on intertemporal choices between multiple dated outcomes, including the sequences model, reason-based theory, salience account, and tradeoff model. In doing so, this paper suggests directions for future research on intertemporal choices between multiple dated outcomes, including a comparison and reconciliation of different theories, an examination of loss outcomes, and an application of eye-tracking techniques.
作者 江程铭 谢铠杰 何铨 JIANG Cheng-Ming;XIE Kai-Jie;HE Quan(College of Economics and Management, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310023, China;College of Education, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310023, China;College of Politics and Public Administration, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310023, China)
出处 《心理科学进展》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2018年第5期922-927,共6页 Advances in Psychological Science
基金 国家自然科学基金面上项目(71571164) 浙江省自然科学基金面上项目(LY15C090005 LY17G010009) 教育部社科项目(16YJC840006) 浙江省哲学社会科学重点研究基地--技术创新与企业国际化研究中心资助
关键词 跨期选择 单时点结果 多时点结果 intertemporal choice single dated outcome multiple dated outcomes
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献130

  • 1李纾.艾勒悖论(Allais Paradox)另释[J].心理学报,2001,33(2):176-181. 被引量:17
  • 2李纯青,徐寅峰.消费者行为分析中贴现因子的确定方法研究[J].西安理工大学学报,2003,19(4):383-387. 被引量:1
  • 3周浩,龙立荣.共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法[J].心理科学进展,2004,12(6):942-950. 被引量:3536
  • 4李纯青,徐寅峰.动态消费者选择模型及贴现因子的确定[J].管理科学学报,2005,8(3):50-55. 被引量:16
  • 5Anderson,C.J. The psychology of doing nothing:Forms of decision avoidance result from reason and emotion[J].Psychological Bulletin,2003,(01):139-166.
  • 6Anderson,N.H,Shanteau,J.C. Information integration in risky decision making[J].Journal of Experimental psychology,1970,(03):441-451.
  • 7Baron;J;李纾;梁竹苑.思维与决策[M]北京:中国轻工业出版社,2009.
  • 8B(o)ckenholt,U,Hynan,L.S. Caveats on a process-tracing measure and a remedy[J].JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL DECISION MAKING,1994,(02):103-117.
  • 9Bernoulli,D. Exposition of a new theory on the measurement of risk[M].Econometrica:Journal of the Econometric Society,1954.23-36.
  • 10Bimbaum,M.H,Navarrete,J.B. Testing descriptive utility theories:Violations of stochastic dominance and cumulative independence[J].JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY,1998,(01):49-79.

共引文献74

同被引文献35

引证文献3

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部