期刊文献+

2010至2011年我国华北和华东地区老年Colles骨折患者的流行病学特征分析 被引量:3

Epidemiological comparison of Colles fractures in the elderly between northern and eastern China from 2010 to 2011
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的对比分析中国华北地区和华东地区2010年1月至2011年12月老年Colles骨折患者的流行病学特点。方法利用医学影像计算机存档与传输系统(PACS)及病案查询系统收集2010年1月至2011年12月华北地区和华东地区39家医院诊治的老年Colles骨折患者资料。将华北地区18家医院资料定义为华北组,华东地区21家医院资料定义为华东组,对比分析两组患者性别、年龄、侧别等。结果共收集老年Colles骨折2 610例,其中男性466例(17.85%),女性2 144例(82.15%),男女比为1∶4.60;年龄中位数为70岁;左侧(1 372例,52.57%)多于右侧(1 238例,47.43%)。华北组1 777例,其中男性349例,女性1 428例,男女比为1∶4.09;华东组833例,其中男性117例,女性716例,男女比为1∶6.12,差异有统计学意义(χ~2=12.102,P=0.001)。华北组和华东组年龄中位数分别为69岁和71岁,差异有统计学意义(Z=-4.372,P<0.001)。华北组和华东组均为60~65岁年龄段构成比最高,分别占35.34%(628/1 777)和29.05%(242/833),两组60~65岁、81~85岁和≥86岁3个年龄段构成比差异有统计学意义(χ~2=10.094,χ~2=5.028,χ~2=24.885,P<0.05),其他年龄段构成比差异无统计学意义。华北组和华东组老年Colles骨折均为左侧多于右侧,差异无统计学意义。结论老年Colles骨折女性多于男性,左侧多于右侧,60~65岁年龄段构成比最高,约占1/3。与华东地区相比,华北地区老年Colles骨折患者年龄低,男女比高,60~65岁年龄段构成比高,81~85岁和≥86岁年龄段构成比低。 Objective To compare and analyze the epidemiological features of Colles fractures inthe elderly between Northern and Eastern areas of China from January 2010 to December 2011. MethodsData of Colles fractures treated between January 2010 to December 2011 in 39 hospitals in northern andeastern China were collected through the PACS system and case reports checking system. Data of 18hospitals in northern China were classified as group northern, while data of 21 hospitals in eastern Chinawere classified as group eastern. Gender, age and side between two groups were compared. Results A totalof 2,610 Colles fractures in the elderly were divided into group northern (1,777 cases) and group eastern(833 cases). There were 466 males (17.85%) and 2,144 females (82.15%), with a male/female ratio of 14.60and a median age of 70 years. Left fractures (1,372 cases, 52.57%) were more than the right side (1,238cases, 47.43%). There were 349 males and 1,428 females in group northern (M/F=1:4.09), and 117 malesand 716 females in group eastern (M/F=1:6.12, c2=12.102, P=0.001). The median age of the two groupswere 69 years and 71 years, respectively, with a statistically significant difference (Z=-4.372, P〈0.001). Thepredominant age group in two groups was from 60 to 65 years, accounting for 35.34% (628/1,777) and29.05% (242/833), respectively. The age distribution had significant differences in patients aged 60-65 years,81-85 years and ≥86 years between the two groups (c2=10.094, c2=5.028, c2=24.885, P〈0.05). There wereno significant differences of other age groups between group northern and group eastern. There were moreleft fractures than right side in group northern and group eastern. Conclusions Colles fractures in elderlywere most seen in females and left side. The predominant age group was from 60 to 65 years, accounting forabout 1/3 of all injuries. Compared with eastern China, the patients were younger. The male/female ratio andproportion of 60 to 65 years were higher, while the proportion of 81-85 years and ≥86 years was lower.
作者 刘松 李佳 韩志刚 李石伦 陈伟 朱燕宾 张飞 孙家元 张英泽 Liu Song;Li Jia;Han Zhigang;Li Shilun;Chen Wei;Zhu Yanbin;Zhang Fei;SunJiayuan;Zhang Yingze(The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Key Laboratory of OrthopaedicBiomechanics of Hebei Province, Orthopaedic Research Institution of Hebei Province, Shijiazhuang 050051,China;Hebei Institute of Communications, Shijiazhuang 051430, China)
出处 《中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志》 2018年第3期180-183,共4页 Chinese Journal of Geriatric Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation(Electronic Edition)
基金 河北省医学科学重点研究课题(20170653)
关键词 老年人 COLLES骨折 桡骨骨折 流行病学 性别分布 Aged Colles'fracture Radius fractures Epidemiology Sex distribution
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献60

  • 1张鹏,王天兵.下尺桡关节损伤的研究进展[J].中华肩肘外科电子杂志,2014,2(3):200-203. 被引量:14
  • 2李海波,郭荣光.桡骨远端伸直型骨折138例临床分析[J].中华全科医师杂志,2005,4(2):103-103. 被引量:3
  • 3冯经旺,尹憬颀,冯翔宇,沈景辉,谭志伟,冯运华,汤克沪.T形钛钢板内固定治疗桡骨远端粉碎性骨折[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2005,20(7):493-494. 被引量:5
  • 4姜保国.桡骨远端骨折的治疗[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2006,8(3):236-239. 被引量:186
  • 5Hanel DP, Jones MD, Trumble TE. Treatment of com- plex fractures wrist fractures [ J ]. Orthop Clin North Am ,2002,33 ( 1 ) :35-38.
  • 6Linda LA. Colles' Fracture [ J ]. Orthopaedic Nursing, 2008,2 (27) : 140-145.
  • 7Handoll HH, Huntley JS, Madhok R. External fixation versus conservative treatment for distal radial fractures in adults [ J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2007, 18 ( 3 ) : CD006194.
  • 8David WW, Derek PL, Gary SB. Replicating a Colles fracture in an excised radius: Revisiting testing proto- cols[ J ]. Journal of Biomechanics, 2012,45 ( 6 ) : 997- 1002.
  • 9Hegeman JH, Oskam J, Vierhout PA, et al. External fix- ation for unstable intraarticular distal radial fractures in women older than 55 years. Acceptable functional end results in the majority of the patients despite significant secondary displacement [ J ]. Injury, 2005,36 ( 2 ) : 339- 344.
  • 10Pritchett JW. External fixation or closed medullary pin- ning for unstable Colles fractures? [ J ]. J Bone Joint Surg, 1995,77(2) :267-269.

共引文献101

同被引文献33

引证文献3

二级引证文献26

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部