期刊文献+

PPH联合小切口外痔剥除术治疗环状混合痔的疗效观察 被引量:9

PPH Combined with Mini-incision External Dissection in the Treatment of Circumferential Mixed Hemorrhoids:Effect Observation
原文传递
导出
摘要 为探讨吻合器痔上黏膜环切术(PPH)联合小切口外痔剥除术治疗环状混合痔的临床疗效,将120例混合痔患者随机分为观察组和对照组,各60例,观察组行PPH联合小切口外痔剥除术治疗,对照组行常规外剥内扎术治疗,对比2组手术总体疗效、术中出血量、手术时间、术后疼痛、肛门狭窄情况。结果显示,2组总有效率比较差异无统计学意义,P>0.05;但是在术中出血量、手术时间、术后疼痛程度及肛门狭窄发生率方面,观察组明显优于对照组,P<0.05。结果表明,与外剥内扎术相比,PPH联合小切口外痔剥除术治疗环状混合痔的总体疗效与外剥内扎术相当,但在术中出血量、手术时间、术后疼痛、肛门狭窄等方面具有明显优势,值得临床推广应用。 This study was to explore the clinical effect of PPH combined with mini-incision external dissec tion in the treatment of circumferential mixed hemorrhoids, randomly divided 120 cases of this hemorrhoids into observation group and control one,60 cases for each,which the former received above combined surgery, meanwhile the latter still adopted external dissection &. internal ligation;then compared whole effect, intraoperative bleeding volume, operative time, and the status on postoperative pain and on anal stenosis between the two groups. As results, in total effective rate there was no statistical difference between the two groups( P 〉0.05) ,but in intraoperative bleeding volume,operative time,postoperative pain degree and anal stenosis the former was all significantly superior to the latter( P 〈0.05).Resuhs show that PPH corn bined mini-incision external dissection has the same whole effect as external dissection & internal ligation, but in other indexes is superior to latter one,significantly.
作者 杨平 YANG Ping(The People's Hospital of dingchuan County ,Pingliang ,Gansu 74430)
出处 《中国肛肠病杂志》 2018年第2期22-24,共3页 Chinese Journal of Coloproctology
关键词 混合痔 PPH刊 切口外痔剥除术 疗效 Mixed hemorrhoid^PPH Mini-incision external dissection Effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献31

  • 1杨晓东,潘凯,王东,夏利刚,陈小春,李明伟,王晓学,钟克力.吻合器痔上黏膜环形切除术与外剥内扎术的对比研究[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2004,7(5):386-388. 被引量:64
  • 2痔临床诊治指南(2006版)[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2006,9(5):461-463. 被引量:2119
  • 3龚建明,范建明,徐琴,顾俊,须海丰.PPH与外剥内扎术治疗重度痔的比较分析[J].长春中医药大学学报,2007,23(5):43-44. 被引量:15
  • 4Longo A. Treatment of hemorrhoids disease by reduction of mucosa and hemorrhoidal prolapse with a circular-suturing device :a new procedure. Proceedings of the Sixth World Congress of Endoscopic Surgery. Rome, 1998. 777-784.
  • 5Hetzer FH,Demartines N, Handschin AE, et al. Stapled vs excision hemorrhoideetomy: long-term results of a pro- spective randomized trial. Arch Surg, 2002, 137 (3) : 337- 340.
  • 6Shalaby R, Desoky A. Randomized clinical trial of stapled versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg, 2001,88(8) : 1049-1053.
  • 7Mehigan BJ, Monson JR, Hartley JE. Stapling procedure for haemorrhoids versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidec- tomy: randomised controlled trial. Lancet, 2000, 355 (9206) :782 -785.
  • 8Thomson WH. The nature of haemorrhoids. Br J Surg, 1975,62(7) :542-552.
  • 9中华医学会外科学分会肛肠外科组.痔诊治暂行标准[J].中华外科杂志,2003,41(9):699.
  • 10曹传军,郝俊,董功航,许德雄,李少青.PPH与外剥内扎术的对比观察[J].实用全科医学,2008,6(2):122-123. 被引量:11

共引文献2339

同被引文献90

引证文献9

二级引证文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部