摘要
学界比较公认的四类全球大学排名指标体系夸克奎瑞利西蒙兹(QS)世界大学排名、《泰晤士报高等教育》世界大学排名、《美国新闻与世界报道》全球最佳大学排名与软科世界大学学术排名,分析发现它们在主客观指标的权重、教学和科研指标的权重以及对国际化的重视程度等层面都既有差异,也有共同性。据此对我国的"双一流"建设提出相应建议。
This paper analyzes the four acknowledged indicator systems of world university rankings,namely,QS world university rankings,Higher Education of The Thames world university rankings,U. S. News World Report Best Global Universities Rankings and Academic Ranking of World Universities. The study shows that the four systems share differences and similarities in terms of setting the weights of subjective and objective evaluation indicators regarding teaching and research,and internationalization. Based on the findings,the study offers proposals to the construction of ＂Double First Class＂in China.
作者
姚若侠
高文涛
YAO Ruo-xia1, GAO Wen-tao2(1 Department of Disciplinary Construction, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi＇ an 710062, Shaanxi ; 2 School of Education ＆ the Northwest Research Centre for Basic and Teacher Education, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi＇ an 710062, Shaanx)
出处
《当代教师教育》
2018年第1期24-29,共6页
Contemporary Teacher Education
