南海仲裁案“裁决”书的批评性互文分析

A Critical Intertextual Analysis of the“Award” of the South China Sea Arbitration

van Dijk(1993)指出,话语分析应该"更加关注话语分析的社会政治文化预设和含义","学者不应该对当今世界的重大问题漠不关心,他们应该把这种关心体现在其研究中"。本文拟从互文性和再语境化的角度分析南海仲裁案"裁决"书在援引《联合国海洋法公约》以及中菲政府文件上的一些谬误。分析表明"裁决"书很难被视为一个法律文件,它更像一个政治裁决,充分反映了仲裁庭偏执的政治立场和观点。

van Dijk（ 1993： 131） points out that discourse analysis needs to ＂pay more attention to the sociopolitical and cultural presuppositions and implications of discourse analyses＂and that ＂scholars should not be indifferent to the major issues of today＇s w orld,and should also show this in their w ork. ＂（ ibid.： 132） This paper is a critical analysis of the ＂Aw ard＂of the South China Sea Arbitration from the point of view of intertextuality and recontextualization. The analysis show s that the ＂aw ard＂can hardly be seen as a legal document and that it is rather more like a political ＂aw ard＂w ith political biases.