摘要
专家辅助人制度建立,打破了我国诉讼体制中专业性问题由鉴定人垄断的僵局,但是结合我国的专家辅助人参与诉讼的实际情况会发现其制度本身也存在诸多问题。例如我国专家辅助人诉讼地位模糊,专家意见的证据属性不明确,操作程序粗疏等。借鉴英日两国的相关制度,总结各家之言,明确专家辅助人的功能定位,细化其规则设计,这样专家辅助人制度将会更加有效的运行。
The establishment of expert assistance system breaks the deadlock of professional problems in China's litigation system. However, it is found that there are many problems in the system itself. For example, the legal status of the expert assistant in our country is vague, the evidence of expert opinions is not clear, and the operating procedure is not clear either. It is better to draw lessons from the relevant systems of other countries, summarize what the scholars' viewpoint, clarify the functional positioning of the expert assistant and refine their rules design, so that the expert assistance system will be more effective.
作者
黄超
HUANG Chao(Law school of Anhui University, Hefei 230601,China)
出处
《四川职业技术学院学报》
2018年第2期22-26,共5页
Journal of Sichuan Vocational and Technical College
关键词
专家辅助人
诉讼地位
意见效力
expert assistant
legal status
effectiveness of expert opinion