期刊文献+

可调整个体优先级的双边匹配算法 被引量:4

Two-sided matching algorithm with adjustable individual priority
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对传统双边匹配算法单边占优、缺乏最低保障以及无法精细调控个体优先级等问题,提出了可通用于一对一、一对多、多对多双边匹配的WYS算法。WYS算法通过外生给定优先级,使得每个参与主体都有机会遍历自身偏好序中全部对象,从而显著提高匹配结果中最差群体的效用以及全体总效用,并能够对个体效用进行精确调控。随后按照诺奖得主Roth提出的"经济工程学"范式设计实验对WYS算法的性质进行了深入探讨,大量随机实验表明WYS算法匹配结果稳定,能够给予参与主体某种程度的最低保障,且不存在单边占优问题。WYS算法对于维持市场厚度、兼顾效率与公平有重要意义,拓宽了匹配理论的应用范围。 In view of the unilateral dominance problem, the lack of minimum guarantee and inability to adjust individual priority of traditional two-sided matching algorithms, this research proposes WYS algorithm which can be used in one-toone, one-to-many and many-to-many two-sided matching problems. WYS algorithm allows each participant to traverse all the objects in its preference list by exogenously giving priority, thusly the total utility and the utility of the worst group can both be improved. It also makes the individual regulation possible. Then in accordance with the Nobel Prize winner Roth's"economic engineering", experiments are designed to explore the properties of WYS algorithm. The stability feature, non-unilateral dominance feature and participants' minimum guarantee of WYS algorithm are proven by numerous random experiments. WYS algorithm is of great significance in maintaining the thickness of market and balancing between efficiency and fairness, and also enriches the application scenario of matching theory.
作者 王彦博 于瀚辰 沈体雁 WANG Yanbo;YU Hanchen;SHEN Tiyan(School of Government,Peking University, Beijing 100871, China)
出处 《计算机工程与应用》 CSCD 北大核心 2018年第11期198-203,235,共7页 Computer Engineering and Applications
基金 国家自然科学基金(No.71473008)
关键词 双边匹配 市场设计 稳定匹配 单边占优 two-sided matching market design stable matching unilateral dominance
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献91

  • 1谢志军.中国债券拍卖方式比较分析[J].金融研究,2006(5):33-41. 被引量:7
  • 2聂海峰.高考录取机制的博弈分析[J].经济学(季刊),2007,6(3):899-916. 被引量:49
  • 3钱颂迪.运筹学[M].北京:清华大学出版社,1996..
  • 4Abdulkadiroglu,A., Y. Che and Y. Yasuda, 2008, "Expanding ' Choice' in School Choice," Working Paper.
  • 5Abdulkadiroglu, A., P. Pathak, A. E. Roth and T. Sfinmez, 2005, "The Boston Public School Match," American Eco- nomic Review Papers and Proceedings, 95 (2) : 368-371.
  • 6Abdulkadiroglu, A., P. Pathak, A. E. Roth and T. Sonmez, 2006, "Changing the Boston School Choice Mechanism: Strategy-proofness as Equal Access," Working Paper.
  • 7Abdulkadiroglu, A., P. Pathak, A. E. Roth and T. S~nmez, 2005, "The New York City High School Match," American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, 95 (2) :364-367.
  • 8Abdulkadiroglu, A. and T. Sonmez, 1999, "House Allocation with Existing Tenants," Journal of Economic Theory, 88, 233 -260.
  • 9Abdulkadiroglu, A. and T. Sonmez, 2003, "School Choice : A Mechanism Design Aroaeh," American Economic Review, 93, 729-747.
  • 10Abraham, D. J., K. Cechl(n'ova, D. F. Manlove and K. Mehlhorn, 2005, "Pareto Optimality in House Allocation Prob- lems," in Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer, 1163-1175.

共引文献30

同被引文献25

引证文献4

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部