期刊文献+

融合感知差异的货代和货主选择行为异质性揭示 被引量:5

Revelation of Choice Behavior Heterogeneity of Freight Forwarder and Shipper Incorporating Perception Difference
下载PDF
导出
摘要 因角色和感知差异,托运人货运方式选择行为存在显著异质性,故以义乌至宁波出口集装箱内陆段运输通道的公路和铁路运输链为研究对象进行实证研究。通过意向调查采集托运人特征、货物特征和运输链特征数据,使用结构方程模型揭示其与表征感知差异的潜变量方便性和可靠性的关系,结果表明员工数、响应时间、短驳距离和准点次数与潜变量存在显著相关性。包含潜变量的分类模型说明货代和货主的选择行为显著不同:货代对铁路运输链时间变化最敏感,而货主则对可靠性变化最敏感;货代的时间价值是货主的3倍,而其方便性价值仅为货主的一半;铁路对货代的营销应侧重时间,而对货主的营销应侧重费用。 Shippers' freight mode choice behaviors show significant heterogeneity because of their different roles and perception.Thus,the road transportation chain and railroad transportation chain in inland freight corridor of export container from Yiwu to Ningbo Port were considered as empirical research objects.Shipper features,cargo features and transportation chain features were collected by stated preference survey to reveal the relationship between these variables and latent variables such as convenience and reliability.Based on the structural equation model,latent variables were used to present perception discrepancy,indicating that number of employees,response time,drayage distance and punctuality times had significant correlation with latent variables.The classification discrete choice models with latent variables show that the behaviors of freight forwarders and shippers are significantly different.Freight forwarders are more sensitive to the time change of railroad transportation chain,while shippers are more sensitive to the change of reliability.The value of time of freight forwarders is three times that of shippers.However,the willingness-to-pay for convenience of freight forwarders is only half of that of shippers.The railroad department should focus on time when marketing toward freight forwarders,while focusing on cost when marketing toward shippers.
作者 张戎 诸立超 耿一飞 ZHANG Rong;ZHU Lichao;GENG Yifei(College of Transportation Engineering,Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China;Key Laboratory of Road and Traffic Engineering of the Ministry of Education, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804;School of Business Administration, Zhejiang University of Finance & Economics, Hangzhou 310018, China)
出处 《铁道学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2018年第5期11-19,共9页 Journal of the China Railway Society
基金 国家自然科学基金(71271154) 同济大学研究生国际合作培养项目(2016XKJC-006) 同济大学学术能力提升计划
关键词 货运建模 决策主体 行为异质性 潜变量 离散选择 freight modeling decision maker behavior heterogeneity latent variable discrete choice
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献33

  • 1张戎,闫攀宇.基于腹地集装箱生成量分配的海铁联运运量预测方法研究[J].铁道学报,2007,29(2):14-19. 被引量:15
  • 2Ki-Chan Nam. A Study on the Estimation and Aggregation of Disaggregate Models of Mode Choice for Freight Transport [J]. Transportation Research E: Logistics and Trans- portation Review, 1997,33(3) : 223-231.
  • 3GUY PICARD, MARC GAUDRY. Exploration of a Box Cox Logit Model of Intercity Freight Mode Choice [J]. Transportation Research E: Logistics and Transportation Review,1998,34(1) :1-12.
  • 4JOHN Golias, GEORGE Yannis. Determinants of Com- bined Transport's Market Share [J]. Transport Logistics, 1998,1(4) :251-264.
  • 5KENNETH Train, WESLEY W. WILSON. Estimation on Stated-preference Experiments Constructed from Revealed preference Choices[J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological,2008,42(3) : 191-203.
  • 6RICH J, HOLMBLAD P M, HANSEN C O. A Weighted Logit Freight Mode-choice Model [J]. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 2009, 45(6) :1006-1019.
  • 7俞章明 汪传旭.基于MNL模型的托运人港口选择分析.中国水运,2007,:44-46.
  • 8Mar'a Feo, Raquel Espino, Leandro Garcl'a. An Stated Preference Analysis of Spanish Freight Forwarders Modal Choice on the South west Europe Motorway of the Sea [J]. Transport Policy,2011,18(1) :60-67.
  • 9Friedlaender A F, Brookings Institution. The dilemma of freight transport regulation [ M ]. Washington: Brookings Institution, 1969.
  • 10Baumol W J, Vinod H D. An inventory theoretic model of freight transport demand [ J ]. Management Science,1970, 16(7) : 413-421.

共引文献29

同被引文献35

引证文献5

二级引证文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部