期刊文献+

认知风格和策略在Linda问题解决中的作用 被引量:1

The role of cognitive styles and strategy in Linda problem solving
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Linda问题是合取谬误的代表性问题,增加一项"Linda是全人类中的一员"可以降低"谬误"水平。使用理性经验清单探讨个体理性—经验认知风格和策略在增加一题Linda问题解决中所起的作用。结果发现不同认知风格者在Linda问题解决中不存在显著差异,"合取谬误"水平降低主要受解决该问题所用策略影响,而认知风格影响个体的策略选择。 Linda problem is a typical problem of conjunction fallacy, and adding the item "Linda is a person in human being" could reduce the level of "fallacy". The paper is aimed to explore the role of cognitive styles and strategy in the new version of Linda problem solving by using the Rational Experiential Inventory. The results indicated that there were no significant differences of individuals with different cognitive styles in Linda problem solving, the new version of Linda problem could reduce the level of"conjunction fallacy" mainly because of the strategy one used, but cognitive styles influenced individuals' strategy choices.
作者 武文雪 牛盾 WU Wenxue, NIU Dun(School of Education, Qufu Normal University, Qufu 27316)
出处 《心理研究》 2018年第2期136-140,共5页 Psychological Research
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目(13YJA190010) 曲阜师范大学实验技术研究后续资助项目(sj201424)
关键词 Linda问题 认知风格 分析 直觉 策略 Linda problem cognitive styles analysis intuition strategy
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献92

  • 1邝怡,施俊琦,蔡雅琦,王垒.大学生认知需求量表的修订[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2005,19(1):57-60. 被引量:51
  • 2李小平,张庆林.抽象材料选择任务的表象表征视角[J].心理学探新,2006,26(2):31-33. 被引量:2
  • 3刘立秋,陆勇.Linda问题:“齐当别”抉择模型的解释[J].心理科学进展,2007,15(5):735-742. 被引量:7
  • 4艾森克,基恩.认知心理学.上海:华东师范大学出版社,2004.3.
  • 5Bailey,J. (1997). The need for cognition and re- sponse mode in the active construction of an infor- mation domain. Journal of Economic Psychology, 18,69 - 85.
  • 6Cheng,F. ,& Wu,C. (2010). Debiasing the framing effect:The effect of warning and involvement. De- cision Support Systems ,23, 328 - 334.
  • 7Fisk, J. E. , & Pidgeon, N. (1996). Component prob- abilities and the conjunction fallacy: Resolving signed summation and the low component model in a contingent approach. Acta Psychologica,94,1 - 20.
  • 8Leippe, M. R. , Eisenstadt, D. , Rauch, S. M, & Seib, H. M. (2004). Timing of eyewitness expert testi- mony ,jurors need for cognition, and case strength as determinants of trial verdicts. Journal of Applied Psychology. 89,524 - 541.
  • 9Oechssler, J., Roider, A., & Schrnitz, P. W. (2009). Cognitive abilities and behavioral biases. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 72, 147 - 152.
  • 10Petty,R. ,& Caeioppo,J. (1982). The need for cog- nition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychol-ogy,42(1),116 - 131.

共引文献5

同被引文献32

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部