期刊文献+

不同切面超声引导下乳腺肿瘤微创旋切术的疗疗效观察 被引量:5

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨不同切面超声引导下乳腺良性肿瘤微创旋切术的疗效及护理配合。方法选择乳腺良性肿瘤女性患者195例(369个病灶)。按照不同切面超声引导分为2组:A组81例(150个病灶),单纯纵切面超声引导。B组114例(219个病灶),纵切面超声引导联合横切面超声引导,比较两组临床效果。结果A、B组间乳腺肿瘤完全切除率比较,差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05);B组不同直径乳腺肿瘤的旋切次数均较A组明显减少,差异有统计学意义(p〈0.05);B组不同直径乳腺肿瘤的旋切时间均较A组明显缩短(P〈0.05);B组并发症发生率明显低于A组(P〈0.05)。结论纵切面超声引导联合横切面超声引导在乳腺良性肿瘤微创旋切术中的临床应用价值优于单纯纵切面超声引导,值得临床推广。 Objective To investigate the clinical effect and nursing cooperation of minimally invasive rotational resection of breast benign tumors under different ultrasound guidance. Methods 195 female patients with breast benign tumors in our hospital were selected as the subjects, with 369 lesions in all. According to the different ultrasound guidance, they were divided into group A (81 cases, 150 lesions, single longitudinal ultrasound guidance ) and group B ( 114 cases, 219 lesions, longitudinal ultrasound guidance combined with transverse ultrasound guidance ) , and the clinical effect of the two groups were compared and analyzed. Results The difference of breast tumor complete resection rate between group A and B was not statistically significant ( P〉0.05 ) . In different diameter breast tumors, rotary cuttiug frequencies in group B were significantly less than those in group A, the difference was statistically significant ( P〈0.05 ) . In different diameter breast tumors, rotary cutting time in group B was significantly shorter than that in group A, the difference was statistically significant ( P〈0.05 ) . The complication rate in group B was significantly less than that in group A, the difference was statistically significant ( P〈0.05 ) . Conclusion Longitudinal ultrasound guidance combined with transverse ultrasound guidance is superior to simple longitudinal ultrasound guidance in minimally invasive rotational resection of breast benign tumors, worthy of clinical promotion.
出处 《浙江临床医学》 2018年第5期874-876,共3页 Zhejiang Clinical Medical Journal
关键词 乳腺 良性肿瘤 超声引导 乳腺微创旋切技术 Breast Benign tumor Ultrasound guidance Minimally invasive rotational resection
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献55

  • 1周平,陈道谨,吴君辉,李瑞珍,肖丽,罗卓琼.超声引导下麦默通负压抽吸活检仪在切除乳腺良性肿块中的应用[J].中国超声医学杂志,2004,20(9):659-661. 被引量:52
  • 2王汉峰,华春美,刘贞,袁新红,朱素华.超声引导下麦默通(Mammotome)乳腺微创旋切系统在乳腺肿瘤治疗中的应用[J].岭南现代临床外科,2005,5(4):272-273. 被引量:7
  • 3方军初,蒋国勤,陈明,曹华.麦默通乳腺肿块切除术中的超声引导技术[J].江苏医药,2006,32(7):689-689. 被引量:11
  • 4Vargas HI,Agbunag RV,Khaikhali I. State of the art ofmin- imally invasive breast biopsy:Principles and practice [J]. Breast Cancer, 2010,7 (4) : 370-379.
  • 5Fine RE, Boyd BA, Whitworth PW, et al. Percutaneous re- movalof benign breast using a vacuum-assisted hand-held- devicewith ultrasound guidance[J]. Am J Surg,2012,184 (4) :332-336.
  • 6Fine RE, Pat W, Whitworth JA, et al. Low-risk palpable breastmasses removalusing a vacuum-assisted hand-held device[J]. Am J Surg,2013,186(4):362-367.
  • 7Burbank F. Stereotacticbreast biopsy:Comparison of 14 and 11-gauss Mammotome probe performance and compli- cation rates[J]. Amurg, 2005,63 ( 11 ) : 988-995.
  • 8Diaz LK,Wiley EL,Venta LA. Are malignant cells dis- placed by large-gaugeneedlecorebiopsy of the breast[J]. American Journal of Roentgenology, 2009, 173 (5) : 1303.
  • 9Thomas Boehm, Ansqar Malich,S. NahumGoldberg,et al. Vacuum-assisted resection of malignant tumors with andwithout subsequent radiofrequency ablation:Feasibility of complete tumor treatment testedinan animal model[J]. Jvasc Interv Radiol, 2011,12(9) : 1086.
  • 10March DE,Coughlin BF,Barham RB,et al. Breast mass- es:removal of all US evidence during biopsy by using a handheld vacuum-assisted device initial experience [J]. Radiology, 2010,227 (2) : 549 -555.

共引文献40

同被引文献47

引证文献5

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部