期刊文献+

从中心论到互构论:构建基于核心概念的劳动关系分析框架 被引量:5

From Centric-Theory to Mutually-Constructive Theory:Constructing Core Concepts-based Anlytical Framework of Labour Relations
原文传递
导出
摘要 我国劳动关系基础理论研究一直以来未能突破对西方经典理论的梳理与反思,抑或将其他学科理论与劳动关系的经典理论结合在一起进行分析,鲜有从破立思维角度入手,对现有的理论重新进行反思且提出更加适应劳动关系变化规律的理论。本文旨在通过对西方经典理论的再思考重新挖掘经典理论中所谓"中心论"的价值,并基于此,从回归劳动关系核心概念的视角建构以互构论为基础的劳动关系分析框架。这一理论框架的建构更加适用于分析我国较为复杂、多变的劳动关系问题与现象。同时,本文也为我国在劳动关系基础理论研究提供了更多的思考与发展的空间。 The study of fundamental theory in labour relations in China still remains in reivewing and re-thinking the western models, or combining appraoches from other perspective with the labour relations theories. Less breakthrough can be seen in terms of proposing more adaptable thoery to explanation for the change of labour relations via reviewing current knowledge. The paper intends to create a new analytical framework from the view of interaction bewteen key concepts based on re-exploring the value of so-called "centric theories". This key-concept-centric framework is more conducive to elaborate on complex and dynamic labour problems. And meanwhile, the paper also provides more space for researches on fundamental theories.
作者 孟泉 Meng Quan(School of Labour Economics, Capital University of Economics and Business, Bejing 10007)
出处 《中国人力资源开发》 北大核心 2018年第5期134-142,共9页 Human Resources Development of China
基金 国家社会科学基金重大项目(14ZDA006)
关键词 中心论 互构论 规则 行为 劳动关系形态 Centric Theories Mutally-Constructive Theories Rules Action Configuration of Labour Relations
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献40

  • 1梁萌.在生产体制中发现工人阶级的未来——读布洛维劳动过程理论三步曲之一《辉煌的过去》[J].社会学研究,2007(1):229-236. 被引量:13
  • 2闻翔,周潇.西方劳动过程理论与中国经验:一个批判性的述评[J].中国社会科学,2007(3):29-39. 被引量:112
  • 3托马斯·寇肯、哈瑞·卡兹、罗伯特·麦克西.《美国产业关系的转型》,朱飞、王侃译,北京:中国劳动社会保障出版社,2008年,第9页.
  • 4约翰·巴德:《人性化的雇佣关系》,北京,北京大学出版社,2007.
  • 5Kaufman, Bruce The Global Evolution of Industrial Relations: Events, Ideas and the lIRA. Geneva: International Labor Organization, 2004.
  • 6Morrison, Charles. An Essay on the Relations between Labor and Capital. New York: Aron Press, 1972.
  • 7Edwards, Paul. "The Employment Relationship and the Field of Industrial Relations". In P. Edwards (ecl.). Industrial Relations, Theory and Practice (2nd ed. ) . Oxford: Blackwell, 2003.
  • 8Strauss, George. "Comment on.. The Transformation of American Industrial Relations" . Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 1988, 41 (3) - 449- 452.
  • 9Laffer, Kingsley. "Is Industrial Relations an Academic Discipline?" . Journal of Industrial Rela- tions, 1974, 16 (2) .
  • 10Strauss, George - Peter Feuille. "Industrial Relations Research; A Critical Analysis" . Industrial Relations, 1978, 17 (3): 259- 277.

共引文献16

同被引文献64

引证文献5

二级引证文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部