摘要
[目的/意义]针对当前政府决策需要更多民间智慧和社会力量参与的事实,从运营、资金、人员和立场等维度,对发达国家智库建设模式进行比较分析,拟为中国智库建设提供决策参考。[方法/过程]运用文献研读、比较分析等方法,梳理了美欧日等发达国家智库的运营与管理模式,总结了发达国家智库建设的经验与启示,提出了建设中国特色新型智库的对策建议。[结果/结论]认为中国新型智库建设必须营造透明的政治环境,加强智库的专业化发展,开放政府公共信息资源,完善智库建设机制,加强智库人才队伍建设,使智库为政府决策提供高质量的智力支持。
[Purpose/significance] In view of the fact that the current government decision-making needs more folk wisdom and social forces to participate,this paper compares and analyzes the developed countries' think tank construction modes from the dimensions of operations,capital,personnel,positions,and so on,in order to provide references for China's construction of think tanks. [Method/process] Through literature review,comparative analysis and other methods,the paper combs the operation and management modes of think tank in developed countries such as the United States and Europe,summarizes the experience and enlightenments of developed countries' think tank construction,and puts forward suggestions on the construction of new think tanks with Chinese characteristics. [Result/conclusion] It should create a transparent political environment,strengthen the professional development of think tanks, open government public information resources, improve the tank construction mechanism, and strengthen the construction of talent team for Chinese new think tanks' construction,in order to provide high quality intellectual support for government decision-making.
出处
《情报理论与实践》
CSSCI
北大核心
2018年第5期97-103,共7页
Information Studies:Theory & Application
基金
上海市教委国外访学计划项目
上海生产力学会青年学者研究项目"创新驱动战略的情报保障机制研究"(项目编号:2016001)
上海生产力学会青年学者研究项目"基于官产学研的竞争情报战略联盟研究"(项目编号:2016003)的成果
关键词
智库建设
政府决策
比较分析
国外经验
think tank construction
government decision-making
comparative analysis
foreign experience