摘要
"凤鹤之争"由《路柳墙花》而起至《循环》之辩结束,历经了三个阶段,引起了众多报刊影评人的关注。"凤鹤之争"是"软硬之争"中电影理论不断碰撞从而具体表现到一部电影上的必然结果,是在空前政治化的20世纪30年代的电影界话语权的争夺,有着政治话语扩大化及对于视听语言讨论的缺失等弊端。
The dispute between YAO Sufeng and LING He underwent three stages, starting with the debate about Prostitutes and ending with the debate on Cycle. The dispute drew the attention of many film critics of newspapers. It was an inevitable outcome of the film theory in the dispute between softness and hardness. It was the seizure of political discourse in the unprecedentedly political 1930s. However, it had drawbacks of enlarging political discourse and lacking audiovisual language.
作者
欧璐媛
OU Luyuan(College of Chinese Language and Literature, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, Guangxi, Chin)
出处
《安庆师范大学学报（社会科学版）》
2018年第1期21-27,共7页
Journal of Anqing Normal University：Social Science Edition
关键词
凤鹤之争
软硬之争
政治话语
电影理论
the dispute between YAO Sufeng and LING He
the dispute between softness and hardness
political discourse
movie
