摘要
互联网平台责任的设置,直接体现政府规制理念并决定政府规制与平台自我规制的合作规制之基本架构。通过将互联网平台与传统传播媒介进行比较,探索性地赋予平台严格责任与过失责任机制,美国发展至今以两部法律为主要规范依据、在不同权利保护领域赋予平台承担不同程度注意义务与责任机制的规制模式。美国模式体现的区别保护理念、规范主义规制理念与自愿型自我规制机制,以及现今面临的平台责任规制挑战,值得我们重视与反思。
The establishment of Internet platform responsibilities directly reflects the government regulation concept and determines the basic structure of the cooperative regulation between government regulation and platform self-regulation. By comparing the Internet platform with traditional media,the platform has been given strict liability and negligent liability. The U. S. A. has so far used two laws as the main normative basis,and given platforms different levels of duties and responsibilities in different rights protection areas. The distinguishing concept of protection,the normative regulation concept,and the voluntary self-regulatory mechanism embody in the American model. This practice and the challenges in platform responsibility regulation facing us today,deserve our attention and reflection.
作者
谢尧雯
XIE Yao-wen(Institute of Evidence Law and Forensic Science of China University of Political Science and Law, Beijing, 10008)
出处
《行政法学研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2018年第3期133-144,共12页
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW REVIEW
关键词
平台责任
政府规制
平台自我规制
合作规制
Platform Responsibility
Government Regulation
Platform Self - regulation
Cooperative Regulation