期刊文献+

再论英国普通法的理性特质——以学术史上的两次争议为考察对象 被引量:2

Revisiting the Rational Characteristics of British Common Law——Taking the Two Disputes in Academic History as the Object of Study
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在法学领域,无论是理论界还是实务界对英国普通法的理性问题仍存在一些模糊或不准确的认识。这种态势对我国借鉴英美法经验建设中国社会主义法治产生了消极影响。通过对学术史上两次关于普通法理性问题争议的再梳理,有助于我们更为系统全面地阐释英国普通法的理性特质,展示普通法所具有的高级理性,这对于我们准确客观地认识评价英美法,更好地借鉴其法治经验大有裨益。 In the field of law,there is still some vague or incorrect understanding of the rational problems of the British common law,either in theory or in practice. This situation has brought about some negative effects on the construction of the socialist rule of law in China. For this reason,we have again combed up the two controversies over the common law rationality in the academic history. This paper tries to explain the rational characteristics of the common law in Britain more systematically and comprehensively,and demonstrates the advanced rationality of the common law.
作者 刘吉涛 Liu Jitao(Law School, Shandong Normal University, Jinan Shandong, 25001)
出处 《山东师范大学学报(人文社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第2期56-70,共15页 Journal of Shandong Normal University(Humanities and Social Sciences)
基金 中国法学会后期资助项目"分权与制衡:英国普通法人权保障制度的基石与灵魂"(CLS[2015]D021)的阶段性成果
关键词 普通法 技艺理性 进化理性 the common law artificial reason evolutionary reason
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献39

  • 1[5]邓小平文选(第2卷)[C].北京:人民出版社,1994.
  • 2[4]J·Barry,Hayek's Social and Political Philosophy,London,1979,P9.
  • 3[15]亚当·弗格森.文明社会史论[M].沈阳:辽宁教育出版社,1999,187.
  • 4哈耶克.致命的自负[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2000..
  • 5Ibid.
  • 6EngRep.
  • 7Commons‘Journals,1621.
  • 8D.M.Kerly.Historical Sketch of the Equitable Jurisdiction of the Court of Chancery,1890.
  • 9The King‘s Orderand Decree in Chancery,1616.
  • 10Mark Fortier.Equity and Ideas:Coke,Ellesmere and James IRenaissance Quarterly,1998.

共引文献5

同被引文献8

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部