期刊文献+

对威廉姆森反透明性系列论证的质疑 被引量:1

Objections of Williamson's Anti-luminosity Series of Arguments
原文传递
导出
摘要 在简要介绍威廉姆森反透明性系列论证的基础上,对其论证的过程进行细致的剖析,发现他的反透明性论证和反KK原则论证统一于他的"容错边界"理论。然后通过"廓清认知途径"的方法来否证他的反KK论证,通过对"容错边界"的质疑来质疑他的反透明性论证,最后指出:无论在威廉姆森的知识概念上,还是他的反透明性系列论证的过程中,都存在双重标准的问题。 This paper was based on a brief introduction to Williamson's Anti-luminosity series of arguments,and a detailed analysis was made of his demonstration process. It had found that Williamson's Anti-luminosity arguments and Anti-KK principle argumentation were unified in his " margin for error" theory. Then,disproving his Anti-KK demonstration by " clearing cognitive approach" and disproving his Anti-KK principle argument by negating his " margin for error" theory. The paper finally pointed out that neither Williamson's concept of knowledge nor his Anti-luminosity series of arguments,there were double standard problem.
作者 胡兰双 HU Lan-shuang(Department of Philosophy, Peking University, Beijing 100872 ,Chin)
机构地区 北京大学哲学系
出处 《自然辩证法研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第5期23-29,共7页 Studies in Dialectics of Nature
关键词 KK论题 反KK原则 透明性 知识的确定性 KK topic Anti- KK principle luminosity Exact knowledge
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献8

  • 1Hintikka, J. "Knowing that One Knows" Reviewed [J]. Syn- these, 1970 (21).
  • 2Williamson, T. Knowledge and its Limits [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
  • 3Dokic, J. and lgr6, P. Margin for error and the transparency of knowledge[J]. Synthese, 2009 (166).
  • 4O'Connor, D. Pragmatic Paradoxes[J]. Mind, 1948.
  • 5Quine, W. V. On a So-Called Paradox[J]. Mind, 1953 (62).
  • 6Montague, R. and Kaplan, D. A Paradox Regained [J]. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 1960(1).
  • 7Williamson, T. Inexact Knowledge[J]. Mind, 1992(101).
  • 8雒自新,黄华新.心智行动及其产品——沃森选择任务新探[J].自然辩证法研究,2012,28(12):9-13. 被引量:5

共引文献2

同被引文献1

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部