期刊文献+

徐光启与晚明儒学核心概念的突破——以“格物穷理”为中心的考察

Xu Guangqi and the Breakthrough of the Core Concept of Confucianism in Late Ming Dynasty:An Investigation Centered on “The Investigation of Things and Fathoming of Principles”
原文传递
导出
摘要 自宋以后,"格物穷理"成为儒学核心概念之一。此后虽有诸多儒者从各个角度予以阐发,但始终未出"格物(人事+自然)-穷理(物理+事理)-知天理"的框架。至晚明徐光启时,他通过对传统格物穷理观和西学格物穷理观的两相比较、各有所取的基础上,对格物范围及优先程度进行了重新确定、对格物方法予以扩充与精致化、对穷理目的进行了转变,最终建立起一个"格物(客观自然)-穷理(物理)-求其故"的新型格物观,实现了对传统儒学"格物穷理"概念的突破,推动了传统儒学的近代化转型。从这一点来看徐光启在中国儒学史上应占有重要的一席之地。 "The Investigation of Things and Fathoming of Principles"becomes one of the core concept of Confucianism since the Song Dynasty. After that,a lot of Confucians elaborated this concept from various angles,however,none of them break the frame of"investigation of things( human affairs + nature)-fathoming of principles( principle of matter + principle of human affairs)-recognition of heavenly principles". Until late Ming Dynasty,Xu Guangqi compared the traditional Chinese concept and western concept of"The investigation of Things and Fathoming of Principles",and took both of their advantages. He redefined the scope and priority of things for investigation,expanded and specified the method of investigation of things,alternated the purpose of fathoming of principles. He finally built a new frame of"investigation of things( objective nature)-fathoming of principles( principle of matter)-to know how nature works". On this basis,he broke the traditional Confucian concept on"The investigation of Things and Fathoming of Principles",and promotes the modern transformation of Confucianism. Hence Xu Guangqi worths an important place in the history of Confucianism.
作者 王静 WANG Jing(Advanced Institute of Confucian Studies, Shandong University, Jinan,Shandong 250100, Chin)
出处 《自然辩证法研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第5期81-87,共7页 Studies in Dialectics of Nature
关键词 徐光启 格物穷理 格物范围 格物方法 穷理目的 Xu Guangqi The Investigation of things and fathoming of principles scope of investigation of things method of investigation of things pur-pose of fathoming of principles
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献7

  • 1李春勇.二十世纪中国逻辑学的成就与不足[J].上海行政学院学报,2004,5(6):19-25. 被引量:1
  • 2宋·朱熹.朱子语类[M].北京:中华书局,1986.
  • 3明·方以智.物理小识[M].上海:商务印书馆,1937.
  • 4[韩]金永植.朱熹的自然哲学[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社,2003.
  • 5W.J.Peterson: Fang I-Chih: "western learn- ing and investigation of things'The unfolding of Neo-confucianism [M]. Columbia University Press, 1975.
  • 6明·方以智:通雅[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1988.
  • 7萧菱父.明清启蒙学术流变[M].沈阳:辽宁教育出版社,1995.

共引文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部