期刊文献+

FOCUS超声刀开放性甲状腺切除术与传统开放性甲状腺切除术的对比研究 被引量:3

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨FOCUS超声刀在开放性甲状腺切除术的应用价值。方法回顾性分析184例甲状腺占位患者临床资料,根据手术方式分为FOCUS组和对照组,FOCUS组采用FOCUS超声刀进行开放性甲状腺切除术,对照组进行传统开放性甲状腺切除术。比较两组患者手术情况的比较、甲状旁腺激素(PTH)和Ca2+水平、术后并发症发生率和复发率。结果 Focus组手术时间、术中出血量、术后疼痛评分、引流量、拔管时间、住院时间、治疗费用、并发症发生率均低于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。与术前比较,Focus组术后PTH和Ca^(2+)水平均无明显变化(P>0.05),对照组术后PTH和Ca2+水平较术前均明显降低(P<0.05)。两组术后3年内的复发率无统计学差别(χ~2=0.571,P=0.654)。结论与传统开放性甲状腺切除术比较,FOCUS超声刀开放性甲状腺切除术具有术后疼痛低、并发症少、费用低、对甲状旁腺功能影响小等优点,将Focus超声刀应用于开放性甲状腺切除术安全、有效。
出处 《浙江创伤外科》 2018年第2期229-230,共2页 Zhejiang Journal of Traumatic Surgery
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献90

  • 1高力.Miccoli内镜术式与甲状腺手术操作的微创化[J].中华外科杂志,2006,44(1):10-13. 被引量:80
  • 2Paolo MD,Gabriele MD, Mario PhD,et al. Evaluation of a new ultrasonic device in thyroid surgery:comparative randomized study[J]. J Surg Am, 2010,199(7) :736-740.
  • 3Karvounaris DC,Antonopoulos V,Psarras K,et al. Efficacy and safety of ultrasonically activated shears in thyroid surgery[J]. Head Neck,2006,28 ( 11 ) : 1028-1031.
  • 4Bodian CA,Freedman G,Hossain S,et al. The visual analog scale for pain :clinical significance in postoperative patients[J]. Anesthesiology, 2001,95(6): 1356-1361.
  • 5Dionigi G,Barczynski M,Chiang FY,et al.Why monitor the recurrent laryngeal nerve in thyroid surgery? [J]. J Endocrinol invest,2010,33( 11 ) : 819-822.
  • 6Rafii A, Camicas A,Ferron G,et al. A comparative study of laparoscopic extraperitoneal lymphadenectomy[correction of laparoscopy] with the use of ultrasonically activated shears[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol,2009,201 (4) : 370-375.
  • 7Cirocchi R,Dajello F,Trstulli S,et al. Meta-analysis of thyroidectomy with ultrasonic dissector versus conventional clamp and tie[J]. World J Surg Oncol,2010,23(12) : 112-118.
  • 8Ferreira-Valente M A, Pais-Ribeiro J L, Jensen M P. Validity of four pain intensity rating scales [J]. Pain, 2011,152(10) : 2399-2404.
  • 9Herr K A, Spratt K, Mobily P R, et al. Pain intensity assessment in older adults: use of experimental pain to compare psychometric properties and usability of selected pain scales with younger adults [J]. Clin J Pain, 2004,20(4) :207-219.
  • 10Miro J, Castarlenas E, Huguet A. Evidence for the use of a numerical rating scale to assess the intensity of pediatric pain [J]. Eur J Pain, 2009, 13(10) : 1089-1095.

共引文献687

同被引文献31

引证文献3

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部