期刊文献+

论商事仲裁员的责任及其在我国的制度完善

On the Liability of the Commercial Arbitrator and the System Perfection in China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 商事仲裁员责任是确保商事仲裁员仲裁行为独立性与公正性的关键要素,是仲裁制度特点和优势发挥的必要条件。商事仲裁员责任包括民事、刑事和纪律责任三种。商事仲裁员民事责任具有相对豁免性,范围应限于善意司法性行为。应考量仲裁属性设定商事仲裁员刑事责任制度,可以"非国家工作人员受贿罪"追究商事仲裁员刑事责任。商事仲裁员承担纪律责任是仲裁业和仲裁机构内在发展的必要,可从构建中国仲裁协会和健全各仲裁机构仲裁规则入手完善我国商事仲裁员纪律责任制度。 The commercial arbitrator’s liability is the key element to ensure the independence and impartiality for the commercial arbitrator’s behavior and the necessary condition to give full play to the characteristics and advantages of the arbitration.The commercial arbitrator’s liability mainly divides the civil liability and the criminal liability and the discipline liability.The commercial arbitrator’s civil liability is relatively immune.It is limited to the goodwill judicial behavior.It is necessary to set the criminal liability system for the commercial arbitrator to consider the attribute of the commercial arbitration.It may be investigated for the criminal liability of the arbitrator by the"bribery crime of non-official servant".To set up the discipline liability for the arbitrator is necessary for the internal development of the arbitration institutions and industry.We can construct the discipline liability system of the arbitrator by establishing the arbitration association and improving the arbitration rules of the arbitration institutions in China.
作者 李铁喜 LI Tiexi(College of Politics and Law,Huizhou college,Huizhou 516007,China)
出处 《湖南工程学院学报(社会科学版)》 2018年第2期95-100,共6页 Journal of Hunan Institute of Engineering(Social Science Edition)
关键词 商事仲裁员责任 善意司法性行为 商事仲裁员刑事责任 商事仲裁员纪律责任 liability of commercial arbitrator goodwill judicial behavior commercial arbitrator’s criminal liability commercial arbitrator’s discipline liability
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献21

  • 1王苹.仲裁员与当事人法律关系探讨[J].沈阳工程学院学报(社会科学版),2004(2):130-131. 被引量:6
  • 2阎铁毅,梁淑妍.关于仲裁员责任制度的思考[J].中国海商法年刊,2002,14(1):290-298. 被引量:11
  • 3陈兴良.刑法谦抑的价值蕴含[J].现代法学,1996,18(3):14-25. 被引量:191
  • 4Pierre Jolidon, Commentaire du Concordat Suisse sur L'arbitrage 1984, 231.
  • 5[英]彼得?????斯坦,约翰?香德著,王献平译.西方社会的法律价值[M].北京:中国法制出版社,2004.183;112.
  • 6黄雅萍.仲裁员责任制度研究[A].载韩健主编.涉外仲裁司法审查[C].北京:法律出版社,2006,271.
  • 7Butz v. Economou, 438 U.S. 478(1978) at 512.
  • 8Maureen A. Weston, Reexamining Arbitral Immunity in an Age of Mandatory and Professional Arbitration, 88 Minn. L. R.ev. 449, Feb., 2004, 505; 515.
  • 9Lundgren v. Freeman, 307 F.2d 104 (9th Cir. 1962).
  • 10Clyde Croft, Australia Adopts the UNCITRAL Model Law, 5 Arb. Int'l,189, 1989, 198.

共引文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部