摘要
20世纪80年代我国法学界引入干涉性法规制度,2010年《中华人民共和国涉外民事关系法律适用法》的颁行使其在立法中占有一席之地。但由于第4条规定笼统模糊,干渉性法规在我国法学理论界始终面临种种质疑。通过对商事领域强制性规范的适用依据、第4条中强制性规定的具体适用对象以及外国干涉性法规的适用空间三个主要争议问题进行剖析,并进一步分析其解决途径,继而论证《法律适用法》第4条视角下干涉性法规的识别标准,才能够为解决当前该制度存在的窒碍提供出路,发挥其限制意思自治、实现公正裁判、维护国家利益之目的。
In the 1980s,China's jurisprudence introduced the Eingriffsnonnen system,and the promulgation of Law ofthe Application of Law for Foreign-related Civil Relations of the People Js Republic of China in 2010 made it emerge inthe legislation. However, as the provisions of Article 4 are generally vague , the Eingriffsnormen has always been questionedin ChinaJ s jurisprudence circles. The article analyzes three controversial questions dealing with applicable basis ofmandatory norms in the field of business, specific applicable object of mandatory provisions in Article 4 and applicableroom for foreign Eingriffsnormen,further studies the solution and demonstrates recognition standards of Eingriffsnormenfrom the perspective of Article 4 of Law of the Application of Law, which may provide a way out for solving the existingobstacles to the system to achieve the purposes of limiting autonomy of will, realizing fair judgment and maintainingnational interests.
作者
张寒雪
ZHANG Han-xue(School of Law, Nankai University, Tianjin 300350, Chin)
出处
《天津商业大学学报》
2018年第3期66-73,共8页
Journal of Tianjin University of Commerce
基金
中国法学会2017年度部级法学研究课题"法律选择协议研究"(CLS(2017)D177)
关键词
干涉性法规
识别标准
《法律适用法》第4条
涉外商事规范
效力性规范
Eingriffsnormen
recognition standards
Article 4 of Law of the Application of Law
foreign-related commercialnorms
effective mandatory norm