摘要
"西方"与"东方"作为西方规训世界的划分方式,带有文化与地缘政治利益的隐喻。"东方"作为"西方"的第一个"他者",近代西方自我建构"世界图像"的整体性想象,通过对东方不遗余力地进行无根据无意识的文本建构,构筑一个"集体的白日梦"(1),究其本质西方在此过程中是为确定自我形象。福楼拜的《布瓦尔和佩库歇》在一定程度上从知识与权力的关系上揭示"东方主义"的文化霸权体系,但是后殖民文艺批判的陷阱在于表面上对西方中心主义话语的"批判"实际仍为西方所操控,甚至对东方也极易陷入"东方主义"的桎梏。
As a division of the western disciplined world,the west and the east have the metaphor of cultural and geopolitical interests.The east as the first"the other"of the west and the whole imagination of the world image of self-construction in the modern western world,through the east to spare no effort to carry out without the basis and unconscious text construction,to build a"collective daydream".The essence of the west in this process is to determine the self-image.Flaubert's"Bouvard et Pécuchet"reveals the cultural hegemony system of orientalism from the relationship between knowledge and power in a certain degree,but the trap of postcolonial criticism of literature and art is that the"criticism"of western center discourse is actually still controlled by the west,even in the East,it is easy to fall into the shackles of"orientalism".
作者
林雪莲
Lin Xuelian(Department of Foreign Languages,Fujian Shipping and Transportation Vocational College,Fuzhou Fujian 350007,Chin)
出处
《衡阳师范学院学报》
2018年第2期156-160,共5页
Journal of Hengyang Normal University