期刊文献+

标准大骨瓣减压术联合血管重建术治疗重型颅脑损伤的疗效及对脑灌注的影响 被引量:19

Effect of Standard Large Trauma Craniotomy combined with Vascular Reconstruction for Severe Traumatic Brain Injury and the Influence on Cerebral Perfusion
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨标准大骨瓣减压术联合血管重建术治疗重型颅脑损伤的疗效及对脑灌注的影响。方法:选择2014年1月至2017年1月我院接诊的90例重型颅脑损伤患者进行研究,通过随机数表法分为观察组(n=45)和对照组(n=45),对照组使用标准大骨瓣减压术治疗,观察组联合脑-硬脑膜-肌肉血管重建术治疗。比较两组血液流变学、凝血功能、颅内压(ICP)、脑灌注量(CCP)、术后并发症及预后。结果:手术后7d,两组全血高切粘度、全血低切粘度、血浆粘度、红细胞压积较手术前均显著降低(P<0.05),观察组两组全血高切粘度、全血低切粘度、血浆粘度、红细胞压积均明显比对照组低(P<0.05);手术后7d,两组凝血酶原时间(PT)、部分凝血活酶时间(APTT)、凝血酶原时间(TT)较手术前均显著升高(P<0.05),观察组PT、APPT、TT明显高于对照组(P<0.05);手术后7d,两组ICP较手术前均显著降低,CCP显著升高(P<0.05),观察组ICP明显低于对照组,CCP明显比对照组高[(16.31±1.70)mmHg vs(21.40±1.94)mmHg,(64.98±7.30)mmHg vs(57.54±6.19)mmHg](P<0.05);两组颅内感染、癫痫、脑积水、切口疝发生率比较均无显著差异(P>0.05);术后6个月时,观察组预后明显对照组优于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:在重型颅脑损伤患者中使用标准大骨瓣减压术联合血管重建术效果显著,可有效改善血液流变学和凝血功能,促进脑灌注,且术后并发症少、预后高,值得应用推广。 Objective: To study the curative efficacy of standard large bone flap decompression combined with revascularization in treatment of severe craniocerebral injury and its effects on cerebral perfusion. Methods: 90 patients of severe craniocerebral injury who received therapy from January 2014 to January 2017 in our hospital were selected as research objects. According to random number table,all the patients were divided into the observation group( n = 45) and the control group( n = 45),the control group was treated with standard large bone flap decompression,while the observation group was combined with brain-duramater-muscle revascularization. The blood rheology,coagulation function,intracranial pressure( ICP),cerebral perfusion volume( CCP),postoperative complications and prognosis were compared between the two groups. Results: The blood viscosity,whole blood low shear viscosity,plasma viscosity and hematocrit of the two groups after sugery7 D were significantly lower than those before operation( P〈0.05). On 7 days after operation,the two groups were significantly lower in whole blood high shear viscosity,whole blood low shear viscosity,plasma viscosity and hematocrit than before operation( P〈0.05). On 7 days after operation,ICP of the two groups were significantly lower than those before the operation,and the CCP was significantly higher( P〈0.05). The ICP in the observation group was significantly lower than the control group,and the CCP was significantly higher than that of the control group [( 16.31 + 1.70) mm Hg vs( 21.40 ±1.94) mm Hg,( 64.98±7.30) mm Hg vs( 57.54±6.19) mm Hg]. There was no significant difference in the incidence of intracranial infection,epilepsy,hydrocephalus and incisional hernia between the two groups( P〉0.05). 6 months after operation,the prognosis in the observation group was significantly better than that in the control group( P〈0.05). Conclusion: The use of standard large bone flap decompression and vascular reconstruction in patients with severe craniocerebral injury has significant effect. It can effectively improve blood rheology and coagulation function,promote cerebral perfusion,and have less postoperative complications and high prognosis. It is worthy of application.
作者 朱世佳 吴世强 范小红 李秀云 ZHU Shijia;WU Shiqiang;FAN Xiaohong(Yangchun People's Hospital,Guangdong Yangchun 529600,Chin)
出处 《河北医学》 CAS 2018年第5期725-730,共6页 Hebei Medicine
基金 广东省医学科研基金立项项目 (编号:A2009716)
关键词 重型颅脑损伤 标准大骨瓣减压术 血管重建术 脑灌注 Severe eranioeerebral injury Standard large bone tlap decompression Revaseularization Cerebral perfusion
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献74

  • 1胡锦,周良辅.基层医院更应该重视和加强颅脑创伤的救治工作[J].中国基层医药,2005,12(4):385-386. 被引量:5
  • 2周良辅,胡锦.加强和重视颅脑创伤的救治工作[J].中华神经外科疾病研究杂志,2005,4(3):193-196. 被引量:9
  • 3于朝春,段国升,余新光,周定标,许百男.小脑幕裂孔疝致颅内血管闭塞[J].中华神经外科杂志,1995,11(4):241-241. 被引量:52
  • 4王韧,田恒力,胡锦,王敢,高文伟,居世明,顾奕,徐涛.重型颅脑损伤合并多发伤的临床救治[J].中国现代医学杂志,2006,16(18):2767-2769. 被引量:4
  • 5江基尧.介绍一种美国临床常用的标准外伤大骨瓣开颅术[J].中华神经外科杂志,1998,11:381.
  • 6Luauté J,Maucort-Boulch D,Tell L,et al.long-term outcomes of chronic minimally conscious and vegetative states[J].Neurology,2010,75:246.
  • 7Giacino JT,Kalmar K.The vegetative and minimally conscious ststes:A comparison of clinical features and functional outcome[J].Head Trauma Rehabil,1997,12:36.
  • 8Sacco S,Altobelli E,Pistarini C,et al.Validation of the Italian version of the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R)[J].Brain Injury,2011,25:488.
  • 9Giacino JT,Smart CM.Recent advances in behavioral assessment of individuals with disorders of consciousness[J].Curr Opin Neurol,2007,20:614.
  • 10陈一民.中重型颅脑损伤患者继发脑梗死的相关危险因素分析[J].医药前沿,2012,(36):32-33.

共引文献149

同被引文献154

引证文献19

二级引证文献101

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部