期刊文献+

图书情报学领域学者论文学术影响力研究(2008-2017年) 被引量:9

Research on Academic Influence of Scholars in the Discipline of Library and Information Science(2008—2017)
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文检索2008-2017年图书情报学领域所有第一作者论文,基于多层级分类评价指标和赋值标准,统计作者发文总量、总被引频次、h指数和篇均被引数据并赋值排序,发布"图书情报学领域学者论文学术影响力前30榜单";同时,根据h指数和篇均被引数两个指标统计所得的前22名与加上发文总量指标的统计结果在榜单上并无显著差异,仅名次略有微调,表明并用h指数和篇均被引频次两个指标具有很强的信度和效度。 Based on the retrieval of first-author papers in the discipline of library and information science published from 2008 to2017,as well as the multi-level evaluation indexes and value assignment standards,this article selects scholars according to their total publication numbers,total citation frequencies,h index and average citation per paper,after assignment and sequencing,it releases a top 30 list of the most academically influential scholars in this discipline.The findings show that there is no statistically significant difference between the top 22 results of statistics based on h value and average citation per paper,and of statistics with the total publication index added,and that there is only a slight difference in ranks.It indicates that h value and average citation per paper are indexes of strong reliability and validity.
作者 张芳 唐崇忻 Zhang Fang, Tang Chongxin
机构地区 华侨大学图书馆
出处 《图书馆工作与研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第5期25-31,共7页 Library Work and Study
基金 福建省社会科学一般项目"文科学者学术影响力动态评价指标体系研究"(项目编号:FJ2017B066)研究成果之一
关键词 学术影响力 H指数 篇均被引频次 图书情报学 Academic influence H index Average citation per paper Library and information science
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献47

  • 1丁楠,周英博,叶鹰.h指数和h型指数研究进展[J].图书情报知识,2008,25(1):72-77. 被引量:41
  • 2J.E.Hirsch,刘俊婉,马建华.衡量科学家个人成就的一个量化指标[J].科学观察,2006,1(1):2-7. 被引量:60
  • 3周春雷,王伟军,成江东.CNKI输出文件在文献计量中的应用[J].图书情报工作,2007,51(7):124-126. 被引量:27
  • 4Priem, J. Altmetrics in the wild, An exploratory study of impact metrics based on social media[EB/OL]. [2015-03-01]. http://jas- onpriem, org/self- archlved/PLoS- altmet rics- sigmet rics11- abstract.
  • 5Binfield P. Plos One: background, future development, and Ar- ticle-Level Metrics [C]// ELPUB2009 Conference on Elec- tronic Publishing. Milan, Italy, 2009 : 69-86.
  • 6Mohammadi, E; Thelwall, NL Mendeley readership altmetrics for the social sciences and humanities:Research evaluation and knowledge flows[J]. Journal of the Association for Informa- tion Science and Technology, 2014,65 (8) : 1627 -1638.
  • 7W. Glanzel,P. Wouters. The dilemmas of performance indica- tors of individual researchers: an urgent debate in bibliomet- ries[J]. ISSI newsletter,2013,9(3) :48-53.
  • 8Bornmann, L. Mimicry in science [-J]. Scientometrics, 2011 (86) :173-177.
  • 9Lane,J. Let" s make science metrics more[J], scientific. Na- ture,2010(6) :464,488-489.
  • 10C. R. Sugimoto. Taking the measure of metrics: interviews with four ASIS&T members[J]. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology ,2012,38(6) :33-38.

共引文献129

同被引文献160

引证文献9

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部