行政行为定型化思维在行政诉讼中的运用——以中国大陆和台湾地区为例

Typological Thinking of Administrative Action in Administrative Proceeding:A Comparative View between Chinese Mainland and Taiwan Region

定型化思维对中国大陆行政法理论与实践均有深刻的影响,无论是行政法学者还是立法者、法官,其专业行为都体现了定型化思维的表征。然而随着各种新型行政行为相继涌现,定型化思维影响下的法律实践对于保护公民合法权利表现出一定的不适应性。从理论、立法和司法三个视角切入,通过比较中国大陆地区和台湾地区行政行为定型化思维在理论与实践中的运用状况,最终表明是否运用定型化思维对于学术研究而言可以自由选择,但在行政诉讼立法与司法实践中则应当逐渐摒弃。

Typological thinking make an significant influence on theory and practice of administrative proceeding in Chinese mainland.Professional behaviors of scholars,legislators and judges all show typological thinking.However,with various administrative actions gradually emerged,administrative proceeding in practice for defending civil rights becomes unsuitable,to a certain extent.Through comparing usage of typological thinking in theory and practice between Chinese mainland and Taiwan Region,in range of study,legislation and judicature,which suggest it is a personal choice to study whether it goes along the path of typological thinking,but it is not necessary to practice and should be abandoned.