期刊文献+

综合护理干预对肺癌接受放疗患者肺功能与生命质量的影响 被引量:8

Effect of comprehensive nursing intervention on lung function and quality of life of lung cancer patients received radiotherapy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨综合护理干预对肺癌接受放疗患者的肺功能、生命质量的影响。方法选取2015年1月至2017年1月在我院接受放射治疗的肺癌患者98例,随机将其等分为对照组和观察组,对照组在放射治疗后予以常规护理干预,观察组在此基础上给予综合护理干预,比较两组患者的肺功能改善情况和生存质量评分。结果护理干预后,观察组第1秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)、最大通气量(MVV)、第1秒用力呼气容积占用力肺活量的百分比(FEV1/FVC)及用力肺活量(FVC)指标均明显高于对照组(P<0.05);观察组的日常生活能力、社会活动能力、抑郁和焦虑症状评分显著低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论综合护理干预能够有效提高肺癌放疗患者的肺功能,提高患者生存质量,值得临床推广应用。 Objective To explore the effect of comprehensive nursing intervention on lung function and quality of life of lung cancer patients received radiotherapy. Methods From January 2015 to January 2017,98 patients with lung cancer who received radiotherapy in our hospital were randomly divided into control group and observation group. The control group received routine nursing intervention after receiving radiotherapy. The observation group received comprehensive nursing intervention based on the control group's treatment,to compare the improvement of lung function and the quality of life score between the two groups. Results After the nursing intervention,the forced expiratory volume in the first second( FEV1),the maximal voluntary ventilation( MVV),the percentage of the forced expiratory volume in one second on forced vital capacity( FEV1/FVC) and forced vital capacity( FVC) index were higher than that of control group( P〈0. 05),the scores of daily life ability,social activity ability,depression and anxiety symptoms in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group( P〈0. 05). Conclusion Comprehensive nursing intervention can effectively improve the lung function of patients with lung,after they received radiotherapy,improved the quality of life of patients,which was worthy of clinical promotion and application.
作者 顾锦花 潘虹 GU Jin-hua;PAN Hong
出处 《护理实践与研究》 2018年第9期91-93,共3页 Nursing Practice and Research
关键词 综合护理干预 肺癌 放射治疗 肺功能 效果 Comprehensive nursing intervention Lung cancer Radiotherapy Lung function Effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献93

  • 1刘嘉湘.中医药治疗肺癌研究思路和临床经验[J].世界中医药,2007,2(2):67-70. 被引量:76
  • 2余虹,邱昕光.老年综合评价体系对老年非小细胞肺癌患者个体化治疗的指导意义[J].中国老年学杂志,2015,35(2):387-389. 被引量:23
  • 3慢性阻塞性肺疾病诊治指南(2007年修订版)[J].中华结核和呼吸杂志,2007,30(1):8-17. 被引量:8233
  • 4RUTTEN-VAN MOLKEN M, ROOS B, VAN NOORD J A. An empirical comparison of the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) and the Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire (CRQ) in a clinical trial setting[J]. Thorax, 1999, 54(11): 995-1003.
  • 5AZARISMAN M S, FAUZI M A, FAIZAL M P, et al. The SAFE (SGRQ score, air-flow limitation and exercise tolerance) index., a new composite score for the stratification of severity in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [J]. Postgrad Med J, 2007, 83(981) : 492-497.
  • 6JONES P W, HARDING G, BERRY P, et al. Development and first validation of the COPD Assessment Test[J]. Eur Respir J, 2009, 34(3): 648-654.
  • 7WEATHERALL M, MARSH S, SHIRTCLIFFE P, et al. Quality of life measured by the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire and spirometry[J]. Eur Respir J, 2009, 33 (5) : 1025-1030.
  • 8SCHUNEMANN H J, GRIFFITH L, JAESCHKE R, et al. Evaluation of the minimal important difference for the feeling thermometer and the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire in patients with chronic airflow obstruction [J]. J Clin Epidemiol, 2003, 56(12): 1170-1176.
  • 9RINGBAEK T, MARTINEZ G, LANGE P. A comparison of the assessment of quality of life with CAT, CCQ, and SGRQ in COPD patients participating in pulmonary rehabilitation[J]. COPD, 2012, 9(1) : 12-15.
  • 10JONES P W, HARDING G, WIKLUND I, et al. Tests of the responsiveness of the COPD assessment test following acute exacerbation and pulmonary rehabilitation[J]. Chest, 2012, 142(1): 134-140.

共引文献387

同被引文献75

引证文献8

二级引证文献52

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部