监察委员会调查权运行法治化的若干问题探讨

Several Problems on the Operation of the Supervisory Committee's Legalized Investigative Power——from the Perspective of the Supervision Law and the Decision on reform of the CPC

在监察委员会的调查程序中,无需单独设置刑事立案程序,因为即便设置了单独的刑事立案程序也无助于对调查措施的规制,而且会影响调查措施的效率。由于实行"纪行刑一体"的组织和调查模式,党的执纪审查与监察调查难以截然区分,但实际上《监察法》可对党的执纪审查与监察委的调查进行一体的规范,以体现党的法治反腐改革目标。在监察调查措施的实施中,对于《监察法》规定不明确之处,可直接适用《刑事诉讼法》和司法解释中的规则,这样既有利于监察程序与刑事诉讼的衔接,也有利于保障监察调查措施的合法性和有效性。检察机关应当对监察机关调查措施的实施进行同步法律监督,可以采取提前介入监察调查或检察引导监察等方式,以体现二者之间既配合又制约的关系。

In the investigation procedure of the supervisory committee,there is no need to set up the criminal filing procedure,because even a separate criminal filing procedure is not conducive to the regulation of investigation measures,and it will affect the efficiency of the investigation measures. The discipline examination and supervisory committee＇s investigation of the CPC are difficult to be distinguished,so they can be regulated by the Supervision Law at the same time. If there are any unidentified points on the Supervision Law during the process of the supervisory implementation,the Criminal Procedure Law and the judicial interpretation can be applied,which is not only conducive to the convergence of supervisory investigation and criminal procedure,but also help to improve the legitimacy and effectiveness of supervision measures. The prosecution should supervise the implementation of the investigative measures of the supervisory committee synchronously by early intervention or supervisory guidance to reflect the coordination and restriction between them.